As used in this chapter:
(a)“Governor” means any person performing the functions of Governor by authority of the law of this State.
(b)“Executive authority” means the Governor or any person performing the functions of Governor in a State other than this State.
(c)“State,” referring to a State other than the State of California, means any other State or Territory, organized or unorganized, of the United States of America.
(d)“Laws of the United States” means: (1)those laws of the United States passed by Congress pursuant to authority given to Congress by the Constitution of the United States where the laws of the United States are controlling, and (2)those laws of the United States not controlling the several States of the United States but which are not in conflict with the provisions of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
State of South Dakota v. Brown, 576 P.2d 473 (Cal. 1978).
· cites it 2× “2) or the provisions of California’s Uniform Criminal Extradition *768 Act (Pen. Code, § 1548 et seq.)? If so, may the courts of this state compel the Governor to discharge that duty? We will conclude that although the Governor’s duty may be characterized as “mandatory,” the…”
People v. Superior Court (Smolin), 716 P.2d 991 (Cal. 1986).
· cites it 2× “) and California (Pen. Code, § 1548 et seq.) have adopted the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act to facilitate their duty to extradite persons charged with crime by another state.”
In re Albright, 129 Cal. App. 3d 504 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982).
“1 specifies the manner in which an arrested person may waive extradition: “Any person arrested in this State charged with having committed any crime in another State or alleged to have escaped from confinement, or broken the terms of his bail, probation or parole may waive the…”
In re Klock, 133 Cal. App. 3d 726 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 2× “Penal Code sections 1548 through 1558, the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (hereafter the extradition act) provide the legal framework for extraditing fugitives from justice.”
In re Daily, 341 P.2d 364 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959).
“231 as amended by the Revised Statutes of Missouri in 1953; California Pen. Code, § 1548,2.) The fact that petitioner left Missouri with the consent of the parole officer of that state does not affect his status as a fugitive.”
Velasco v. Balaam, No. 2:23-cv-00192 (D. Nev. May 24, 2024).
“) Cal. Penal Code § 1548 – 1556.2.” (ECF No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.