California Codes
Cal. Penal Code § 27545 (2026)
Crimes Relating to Sale, Lease, or Transfer of Firearms
✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Where neither party to the transaction holds a dealer’s license issued pursuant to Sections 26700 to 26915, inclusive, the parties to the transaction shall complete the sale, loan, or transfer of that firearm through a licensed firearms dealer pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 28050).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: Barry Bauer v. Xavier Becerra, 858 F.3d 1216 (9th Cir. 2017).
Barry Bauer v. Xavier Becerra, 858 F.3d 1216 (9th Cir. 2017). “The DROS system today requires that “any sale, loan, or transfer of a firearm” be made through a licensed dealer, Cal. Penal Code §§ 27545 , 28050(a), and it requires dealers to keep standardized records of all such transactions, id.”
Matthew Jones v. Rob Bonta, 34 F.4th 704 (9th Cir. 2022). “Cal. Penal Code §§ 27545 , 28050. And second, the purchaser must have a valid firearm safety certificate (“FSC”).”
Silvester v. Harris, 41 F. Supp. 3d 927 (E.D. Cal. 2014). “Gun dealers have the right to refuse to conduct a sale of a firearm.”
Kelly Ann McDougall v. Cnty. of Ventura, 23 F.4th 1095 (9th Cir. 2022). “See Cal. Penal Code §§ 27545 ; 28050. After purchasing, individuals must wait ten days before receipt of the firearm.”
Jones v. Becerra, No. 3:19-cv-01226 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2023). “Cal. Penal Code §§27545 , 28050. At issue in 7 the present case is California Penal Code Section 27510 which prohibits FFLs from selling 8 a firearm to a person under 21 years of age with certain exceptions.”
People v. Hernandez, No. B337629 (Cal. Ct. App. July 11, 2025). “” The People filed a felony complaint alleging Hernandez committed the unlawful transfer of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 27545) (count 1); was carrying a concealed firearm (id.”
Rhode v. Bonta, 145 F.4th 1090 (9th Cir. 2025). “”); see also Cal. Penal Code § 27545 (“Where neither party to the transaction holds a dealer’s license .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.