California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 30000 (2026)

Prohibited Armed Persons File

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The Attorney General shall establish and maintain an online database to be known as the Prohibited Armed Persons File. The purpose of the file is to cross-reference persons who have ownership or possession of a firearm on or after January 1, 1996, as indicated by a record in the Consolidated Firearms Information System, and who, subsequent to the date of that ownership or possession of a firearm, fall within a class of persons who are prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm.

(b)Except as provided in subdivision (c), the information contained in the Prohibited Armed Persons File shall only be available to those entities specified in, and pursuant to, subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 11105, through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, for the purpose of determining if persons are armed and prohibited from possessing firearms.

(c)The information contained in the Prohibited Armed Persons File shall be available to researchers affiliated with the California Firearm Violence Research Center at UC Davis following approval by the institution’s governing institutional review board, when required. At the department’s discretion, and subject to Section 14240, the data may be provided to any other nonprofit bona fide research institution accredited by the United States Department of Education or the Council for Higher Education Accreditation for the study of the prevention of violence, following approval by the institution’s governing institutional review board or human subjects committee, when required, for academic and policy research purposes. Material identifying individuals shall only be provided for research or statistical activities and shall not be transferred, revealed, or used for purposes other than research or statistical activities, and reports or publications derived therefrom shall not identify specific individuals. Reasonable costs to the department associated with the department’s processing of that data may be billed to the researcher. If a request for data or letter of support for research using the data is denied, the department shall provide a written statement of the specific reasons for the denial.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2025 · leading case: Lori Rodriguez v. City of San Jose, 930 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2019).
Lori Rodriguez v. City of San Jose, 930 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2019). “Code § 8103 (f)(1) (2013); see also Cal. Penal Code §§ 30000 , 30005. As a prohibited person, he could not own, possess, control, receive, or purchase any firearm for a period of five years following his release from the hospital.”
Barry Bauer v. Xavier Becerra, 858 F.3d 1216 (9th Cir. 2017). “Cal. Penal Code §§ 30000 , 30005. Essentially, these are people who passed a background check at the time of purchase but would no longer pass that check, yet still possess a firearm.”
Rhode v. Bonta, 145 F.4th 1090 (9th Cir. 2025). “A person whose information matches an entry in the Automated Firearms System (AFS) and is not listed in the Prohibited Armed Persons File, see Cal. Penal Code § 30000 (a), Cal. Code Regs.”
Bauer v. Harris, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (E.D. Cal. 2015). “See CaLPenal Code § 30000. 4 The APPS is “an online database .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.