Cal. Codes » Penal Code / PART 3. OF IMPRISONMENT AND THE DEATH PENALTY / TITLE 1. IMPRISONMENT OF MALE PRISONERS IN STATE PRISONS / CHAPTER 8. Length of Term of Imprisonment and Paroles / ARTICLE 3. Paroles
California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 3043.5 (2026)

Paroles

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)This section shall be known as the “Condit-Nolan Public Participation in Parole Act of 1984.”

(b)Any person interested in the grant or denial of parole to any prisoner in a state prison shall have the right to submit a statement of views in support of or in opposition to the granting of parole. The board, in deciding whether to release the person on parole, shall review all information received from the public to insure that the gravity and timing of all current or past convicted offenses have been given adequate consideration and to insure that the safety of the public has been adequately considered. Upon completion of its review, the board shall include in its report a statement that it has reviewed all information received from the public and its conclusion as to whether the person would pose a threat to the public safety if released on parole.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: Porter v. Lincoln City, 59 F. App'x 985 (9th Cir. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Porter v. Lincoln City, 59 F. App'x 985 (9th Cir. 2003). “See Cal.Penal Code § 3043.5(b) (requiring the parole board to consider information submitted by the public but giving the board discretion to determine whether the prisoner “would pose a threat to the public safety if released on parole”); Baumann v.”
Cal. Penal Code § 3043.5(b): 1 case
Porter v. Lincoln City, 59 F. App'x 985 (9th Cir. 2003). “See Cal.Penal Code § 3043.5(b) (requiring the parole board to consider information submitted by the public but giving the board discretion to determine whether the prisoner “would pose a threat to the public safety if released on parole”); Baumann v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.