California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 330.11 (2026)

Gaming

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

“Banking game” or “banked game” does not include a controlled game if the published rules of the game feature a player-dealer position and provide that this position must be continuously and systematically rotated amongst each of the participants during the play of the game, ensure that the player-dealer is able to win or lose only a fixed and limited wager during the play of the game, and preclude the house, another entity, a player, or an observer from maintaining or operating as a bank during the course of the game. For purposes of this section it is not the intent of the Legislature to mandate acceptance of the deal by every player if the division finds that the rules of the game render the maintenance of or operation of a bank impossible by other means. The house shall not occupy the player-dealer position.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians etc. v. Flynt, 70 Cal. App. 5th 1059 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021).
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians etc. v. Flynt, 70 Cal. App. 5th 1059 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 5× “) Penal Code section 330.11 and Business and Professions Code section 19805, subdivision (c) now provide that a “ ‘banked 6 The Court determined that the provision of Proposition 5 containing the State of California’s waiver of immunity from suit in disputes arising out of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.