This article does not prohibit:
(a)Any lawful activity for the purpose of engaging in any organizational effort on behalf of any labor union, agent, or member thereof, or of any employee group, or any member thereof, employed or formerly employed in any place of business or manufacturing establishment described in this article, or for the purpose of carrying on the lawful activities of labor unions, or members thereof.
(b)Any lawful activity for the purpose of investigation of the safety of working conditions on posted property by a representative of a labor union or other employee group who has upon his person written evidence of due authorization by his labor union or employee group to make such investigation.
Notes of Decisions
Agric. Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Court, 546 P.2d 687 (Cal. 1976).
· cites it 2× “Thus each statute is on par with the other, and the Penal Code provision being a legislative enactment, it must take precedence over the administrative regulation based on a power implied from the labor statute. Moreover, if either the act or the Penal Code provisions must be…”
In re Catalano, 623 P.2d 228 (Cal. 1981).
“(Pen. Code, § 552.1.) Thus recently we reversed the conviction of a labor union official for picketing on the property of a nonparticipant in the labor dispute.”
Cotton v. Superior Court, 364 P.2d 241 (Cal. 1961).
“Code, §602, subdivision (1)) is overridden by Penal Code section 552.1, subdivision (a), which permits trespass in an attempt to organize a labor union.”
United Farm Workers Etc. Comm. v. Superior Court, 254 Cal. App. 2d 768 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967).
“(Pen.Code, § 552.1.) Tims recently wTe reversed the conviction of a labor union official for picketing on the property of a nonparticipant, in the labor dispute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.