California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 647 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) and in subdivisions (k) and (l), a person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor:

(a)An individual who solicits anyone to engage in or who engages in lewd or dissolute conduct in a public place or in a place open to the public or exposed to public view.

(b)(1)An individual who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, an act of prostitution with the intent to receive compensation, money, or anything of value from another person. An individual agrees to engage in an act of prostitution when, with specific intent to so engage, the individual manifests an acceptance of an offer or solicitation by another person to so engage, regardless of whether the offer or solicitation was made by a person who also possessed the specific intent to engage in an act of prostitution.

(2)An individual who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, an act of prostitution with another person who is 18 years of age or older in exchange for the individual providing compensation, money, or anything of value to the other person. An individual agrees to engage in an act of prostitution when, with specific intent to so engage, the individual manifests an acceptance of an offer or solicitation by another person who is 18 years of age or older to so engage, regardless of whether the offer or solicitation was made by a person who also possessed the specific intent to engage in an act of prostitution.

(3)An individual who solicits, or who agrees to engage in, or who engages in, an act of prostitution with another person who is a minor in exchange for the individual providing compensation, money, or anything of value to the minor. An individual agrees to engage in an act of prostitution when, with specific intent to so engage, the individual manifests an acceptance of an offer or solicitation by someone who is a minor to so engage, regardless of whether the offer or solicitation was made by a minor who also possessed the specific intent to engage in an act of prostitution.

(4)A manifestation of acceptance of an offer or solicitation to engage in an act of prostitution does not constitute a violation of this subdivision unless some act, in addition to the manifestation of acceptance, is done within this state in furtherance of the commission of the act of prostitution by the person manifesting an acceptance of an offer or solicitation to engage in that act. As used in this subdivision, “prostitution” includes any lewd act between persons for money or other consideration.

(5)Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, this subdivision does not apply to a child under 18 years of age who is alleged to have engaged in conduct to receive money or other consideration that would, if committed by an adult, violate this subdivision. A commercially exploited child under this paragraph may be adjudged a dependent child of the court pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and may be taken into temporary custody pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, if the conditions allowing temporary custody without warrant are met.

(c)Who accosts other persons in a public place or in a place open to the public for the purpose of begging or soliciting alms.

(d)Who loiters in or about a toilet open to the public for the purpose of engaging in or soliciting a lewd or lascivious or an unlawful act.

(e)Who lodges in a building, structure, vehicle, or place, whether public or private, without the permission of the owner or person entitled to the possession or in control of it.

(f)Who is found in a public place under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a drug, controlled substance, toluene, or a combination of an intoxicating liquor, drug, controlled substance, or toluene, in a condition that they are unable to exercise care for their own safety or the safety of others, or by reason of being under the influence of intoxicating liquor, drug, controlled substance, toluene, or a combination of an intoxicating liquor, drug, or toluene, interferes with or obstructs or prevents the free use of a street, sidewalk, or other public way.

(g)If a person has violated subdivision (f), a peace officer, if reasonably able to do so, shall place the person, or cause the person to be placed, in civil protective custody. The person shall be taken to a facility, designated pursuant to Section 5170 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, for the 72-hour treatment and evaluation of inebriates. A peace officer may place a person in civil protective custody with that kind and degree of force authorized to effect an arrest for a misdemeanor without a warrant. A person who has been placed in civil protective custody shall not thereafter be subject to criminal prosecution or juvenile court proceeding based on the facts giving rise to this placement. This subdivision does not apply to the following persons:

(1)A person who is under the influence of a drug or under the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and a drug.

(2)A person who a peace officer has probable cause to believe has committed a felony, or who has committed a misdemeanor in addition to subdivision (f).

(3)A person who a peace officer in good faith believes will attempt escape or will be unreasonably difficult for medical personnel to control.

(h)Who loiters, prowls, or wanders upon the private property of another, at any time, without visible or lawful business with the owner or occupant. As used in this subdivision, “loiter” means to delay or linger without a lawful purpose for being on the property and for the purpose of committing a crime as opportunity may be discovered.

(i)Who, while loitering, prowling, or wandering upon the private property of another, at any time, peeks in the door or window of an inhabited building or structure, without visible or lawful business with the owner or occupant.

(j)(1)A person who looks through a hole or opening, into, or otherwise views, by means of any instrumentality, including, but not limited to, a periscope, telescope, binoculars, camera, motion picture camera, camcorder, mobile phone, electronic device, or unmanned aircraft system, the interior of a bedroom, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth, or the interior of any other area in which the occupant has a reasonable expectation of privacy, with the intent to invade the privacy of a person or persons inside. This subdivision does not apply to those areas of a private business used to count currency or other negotiable instruments.

(2)A person who uses a concealed camcorder, motion picture camera, or photographic camera of any type, to secretly videotape, film, photograph, or record by electronic means, another identifiable person under or through the clothing being worn by that other person, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person, without the consent or knowledge of that other person, with the intent to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person and invade the privacy of that other person, under circumstances in which the other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. For the purposes of this paragraph, “identifiable” means capable of identification, or capable of being recognized, meaning that someone, including the victim, could identify or recognize the victim. It does not require the victim’s identity to actually be established.

(3)(A)A person who uses a concealed camcorder, motion picture camera, or photographic camera of any type, to secretly videotape, film, photograph, or record by electronic means, another identifiable person who may be in a state of full or partial undress, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person, without the consent or knowledge of that other person, in the interior of a bedroom, bathroom, changing room, fitting room, dressing room, or tanning booth, or the interior of any other area in which that other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, with the intent to invade the privacy of that other person. For the purposes of this paragraph, “identifiable” means capable of identification, or capable of being recognized, meaning that someone, including the victim, could identify or recognize the victim. It does not require the victim’s identity to actually be established.

(B)Neither of the following is a defense to the crime specified in this paragraph:

(i)The defendant was a cohabitant, landlord, tenant, cotenant, employer, employee, or business partner or associate of the victim, or an agent of any of these.

(ii)The victim was not in a state of full or partial undress.

(4)(A)(i)A person who intentionally distributes or causes to be distributed the image of the intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or an image of masturbation by the person depicted or in which the person depicted participates, when subclauses (I) to (III), inclusive, are all true:

(I)The person distributing the image knows or should know that the distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress.

(II)The person depicted suffers serious emotional distress.

(III)One of the following has occurred:

(ia)The person depicted in the image and the person distributing the image had agreed or had an understanding that the image shall remain private.

(ib)The image was knowingly recorded, captured, or otherwise obtained by the person distributing the image without the authorization of the person depicted, and the image was recorded or captured under circumstances in which the person depicted had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

(ic)The image is knowingly obtained by the person distributing the image by exceeding authorized access from the property, accounts, messages, files, or resources of the person depicted.

(ii)A person who intentionally creates and distributes or causes to be distributed any photo realistic image, digital image, electronic image, computer image, computer-generated image, or other pictorial representation of an intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral copulation, sexual penetration, or an image of masturbation by the person depicted or in which the person depicted participates that was created in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to believe the image is an authentic image of the person depicted, under circumstances in which the person distributing the image knows or should know that distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress. This clause shall not apply to a person who was under 18 years of age at the time the person committed the offense.

(B)(i)A person intentionally distributes an image described in subparagraph (A) when that person personally distributes the image.

(ii)A person intentionally causes an image described in subparagraph (A) to be distributed when that person arranges, specifically requests, or intentionally causes another person to distribute the image.

(C)As used in this paragraph, the following terms have the following meanings:

(i)“Distribute” includes exhibiting in public or giving possession.

(ii)“Identifiable” has the same meaning as in paragraphs (2) and (3).

(iii)“Intimate body part” means any portion of the genitals, the anus and, in the case of a female, also includes any portion of the breasts below the top of the areola, that is either uncovered or clearly visible through clothing.

(D)It shall not be a violation of this paragraph to distribute an image described in subparagraph (A) if any of the following applies:

(i)The distribution is made in the course of reporting an unlawful activity.

(ii)The distribution is made in compliance with a subpoena or other court order for use in a legal proceeding.

(iii)The distribution is made in the course of a lawful public proceeding.

(iv)The distribution is related to a matter of public concern or public interest. Distribution is not a matter of public concern or public interest solely because the depicted individual is a public figure.

(5)This subdivision does not preclude punishment under any section of law providing for greater punishment.

(6)A defendant shall not be punished for both a violation of paragraph (4) of subdivision (j) and paragraph (2) of subdivision (j) or Section 502 if that punishment would be barred under Section 654.

(k)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (3), a second or subsequent violation of subdivision (j) is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.

(2)Except as provided in paragraph (3), if the victim of a violation of subdivision (j) was a minor at the time of the offense, the violation is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment.

(3)If the victim of a violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (j) was a minor at the time of the offense, a second or subsequent violation of paragraph (3) of subdivision (j) is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by both a fine and imprisonment. This paragraph shall not apply to a person who was under 18 years of age at the time that they committed the offense.

(l)(1)(A)If a crime is committed in violation of subdivision (b) by a defendant who is 18 years of age or older, the person who was solicited was a minor at the time of the offense, and the defendant knew or should have known that the person who was solicited was a minor at the time of the offense, the violation is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not less than two days and not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, except as provided in paragraph (2).

(B)The court may, in unusual cases, when the interests of justice are best served, reduce or eliminate the mandatory two days of imprisonment in a county jail required by this paragraph. If the court reduces or eliminates the mandatory two days of imprisonment, the court shall specify the reason on the record.

(2)Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a defendant 18 years of age or older may be punished by either imprisonment in a county jail for not less than two days and not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 for any of the following:

(A)The solicited minor was under 16 years of age at the time of the offense, or the person solicited was under 18 years of age at the time of the offense and the person solicited was caused, induced, or persuaded at the time of the solicitation to engage in a commercial sex act as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 236.1.

(B)The solicited minor was more than 3 years younger than the defendant at the time of the offense.

(3)A second or subsequent violation of paragraph (2) is punishable as a felony by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.

(4)A defendant who is convicted of a violation of paragraph (2) shall be ordered by the court, if granted probation, to successfully complete an education program on human trafficking and the exploitation of children. A fee shall not be imposed for participation or enrollment in an education program pursuant to this paragraph.

(5)An individual who provides compensation, money, or anything of value in violation of paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (b) shall, in addition to any other punishment, be punished by a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000). Fines collected pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited in the Survivors Support Fund.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 377 cases (50 in the last 5 years), 1932–2026 · leading case: Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983).
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983). · cites it 6× “I Appellee Edward Lawson was detained or arrested on approximately 15 occasions between March 1975 and January 1977 pursuant to Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 647(e) (West 1970).”
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999). · cites it 4× “269, § 17 (1878); Cal. Penal Code § 647 (1885); Ohio Rev. Stat.”
Lawman v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 159 F. Supp. 3d 1130 (N.D. Cal. 2016). · cites it 6× “Cal. Pen. Code § 647 (f). Defendants argue that under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable officer could have concluded that Lawman was intoxicated in public.”
Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto, 69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “A criminal complaint was filed on April 18, 1997, charging plaintiff with public intoxication (Pen.Code, § 647, subd. (f)) and resisting an officer in the discharge of his duties (Pen.”
People v. Lohbauer, 627 P.2d 183 (Cal. 1981). · cites it 6× “(c)) *374 could be convicted of prostitution (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (b)), on the theory that the various subdivisions of Penal Code section 647 do not state different offenses, but merely define the different circumstances in which one may commit the misdemeanor of disorderly…”
Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long Beach, 793 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2015). · cites it 3× “” These actions, the Officers contended, created probable cause that Velazquez had committed a misdemeanor, in violation of California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1), 8 in the presence of the officers.”
People v. Superior Court (Hartway), 562 P.2d 1315 (Cal. 1977). · cites it 6× “[1] (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (b).) [2] They moved in municipal court for dismissal of the charges on the grounds that section 647, subdivision (b), is unconstitutional on its face and as applied by the Oakland Police Department.”
Pryor v. Mun. Court, 599 P.2d 636 (Cal. 1979). · cites it 4× “11) of the California Vagrancy Law void for vagueness, and an analysis of vagrancy statutes by Professor Arthur Sherry (Sherry, Vagrants, Rogues, and Vagabonds — Old Concepts in Need of Revision (1960) 48 Cal.L.Rev. 557) prompted the 1961 revision of section 647.”
Kirstin Johnson v. Kierstie Barr, 79 F.4th 996 (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 3× “The facts supported the defendants’ assertion that no clearly established law prevented the officers from believing Johnson was in violation of either California Penal Code § 647(f), prohibiting public intoxication, or California Penal Code § 273a, prohibiting child endangerment.”
Newland v. Bd. of Governors, 566 P.2d 254 (Cal. 1977). · cites it 4× “When in 1974 plaintiff William Newland, who was educationally well qualified, sought a community college credential, the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges confronted him with the fact that seven years earlier he had been convicted of a misdemeanor: lewd…”
Marcelo Rodriguez v. Georgios Kyriacos Panayiotou, 314 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3× “Rodriguez left the restroom, and he and his partner arrested Michael, as he exited the restroom, for disorderly conduct, in violation of California Penal Code § 647(a). Michael pled no contest to the charge.”
People v. M.V., 225 Cal. App. 4th 1495 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “22) and had agreed to engage in an act of prostitution (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (b)). The police report filed in connection with this matter described the incident upon which these allegations were based as follows; On October 19, 2012, two police officers spoke *1502 with an…”
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(a) — 3 cases
Marcelo Rodriguez v. Georgios Kyriacos Panayiotou, 314 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2002). “Rodriguez left the restroom, and he and his partner arrested Michael, as he exited the restroom, for disorderly conduct, in violation of California Penal Code § 647(a). Michael pled no contest to the charge.”
United States v. Nunez-Garcia, 262 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (C.D. Cal. 2003).
People v. Charles CA5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(b) — 5 cases
Rivers v. Becerra (S.D. Cal. 2020).
Rivers v. Becerra (S.D. Cal. 2020).
Schmidt v. Jaime (N.D. Cal. 2021).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(c) — 4 cases
Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514 (9th Cir. 1994).
Blair v. Shanahan, 775 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Cal. 1991).
Blair v. Shanahan, 795 F. Supp. 309 (N.D. Cal. 1992).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(e) — 21 cases
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983). “I Appellee Edward Lawson was detained or arrested on approximately 15 occasions between March 1975 and January 1977 pursuant to Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 647(e) (West 1970).”
Commonwealth v. Berryman, 649 A.2d 961 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994).
Christopher Tiplick v. State of Indiana, 43 N.E.3d 1259 (Ind. 2015).
State v. Groves, 363 N.W.2d 507 (Neb. 1985).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(f) — 32 cases
Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long Beach, 793 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2015). “” These actions, the Officers contended, created probable cause that Velazquez had committed a misdemeanor, in violation of California Penal Code Section 148(a)(1), 8 in the presence of the officers.”
Kirstin Johnson v. Kierstie Barr, 79 F.4th 996 (9th Cir. 2023). “The facts supported the defendants’ assertion that no clearly established law prevented the officers from believing Johnson was in violation of either California Penal Code § 647(f), prohibiting public intoxication, or California Penal Code § 273a, prohibiting child endangerment.”
Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto, 69 Cal. Rptr. 3d 365 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “A criminal complaint was filed on April 18, 1997, charging plaintiff with public intoxication (Pen.Code, § 647, subd. (f)) and resisting an officer in the discharge of his duties (Pen.”
Lawman v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 159 F. Supp. 3d 1130 (N.D. Cal. 2016). “Cal. Pen. Code § 647 (f). Defendants argue that under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable officer could have concluded that Lawman was intoxicated in public.”
Comm. for Immigrant Rights v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 644 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (N.D. Cal. 2009).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(g) — 1 case
Torres v. City of Santa Ana, 108 F.3d 224 (9th Cir. 1997).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(h) — 3 cases
Edgerly v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 495 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 2007).
Unknown, 599 F.3d 946.
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(i) — 1 case
Joyce v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 846 F. Supp. 843 (N.D. Cal. 1994).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(j)(4)(a) — 1 case
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(k) — 3 cases
Trujillo v. City of Ontario, 428 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2006).
Drawsand v. F.F. Props., L.L.P., 866 F. Supp. 2d 1110 (N.D. Cal. 2011).
Cramer v. Consol. Freightways, Inc., 209 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(k)(1) — 1 case
State v. Glas, 54 P.3d 147 (Wash. 2002).
— Cal. Penal Code § 647(k)(2) — 1 case
State v. Glas, 54 P.3d 147 (Wash. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.