California Codes

Cal. Water Code § 30000 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This division shall be known and may be cited as the County Water District Law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1952–2024 · leading case: Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20099 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017).
Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20099 (Cal. Ct. App. 5th 2017). “) Despite its name, the District is not a county water district under the County Water District Law ( Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq. ) or a state water district under the California Water District Law ( id .”
Castaic Lake Water Agency v. Whittaker Corp., 272 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (C.D. Cal. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Cal. Water Code § 30000 et seq. (County Water District Law).”
Yancey v. Fink, 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 639 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991). “(Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.) It provides that general district taxes constitute a lien on all property within the district.”
Wright v. Goleta Water Dist., 174 Cal. App. 3d 74 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985). “District is a county water district organized in 1944 pursuant to California Water Code section 30000 et seq.”
Tehachapi-Cummings Cnty. Water Dist. v. Armstrong, 49 Cal. App. 3d 992 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975). “The petition of the defendants and appellants for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied October 1, 1975.”
Freeman v. Contra Costa Cnty. Water Dist., 18 Cal. App. 3d 404 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971). “*410 Appellants argue that the district is without statutory authority to charge them for installation and maintenance of the protective device, as the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.) provides the sole means by which respondent may finance public…”
Arcade Cnty. Water Dist. v. Arcade Fire Dist., 6 Cal. App. 3d 232 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970). “Question Presented Are the fire districts liable for water charges in implied or quasi-contract after express rejection of liability? Record Plaintiffs are two county water districts organized under the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.). The five defendants…”
City of Fresno v. Pinedale Cnty. Water Dist., 184 Cal. App. 3d 840 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986). “Additionally, it concedes the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.) under which District was organized contains no provision precluding the application of the provisions of City’s charter and ordinances regulating solid waste collection.”
Johnson Rancho Cnty. Water Dist. v. State Water Rights Bd., 235 Cal. App. 2d 863 (Cal. Ct. App. 1965). “” (Wat. Code, §§ 30000 et seq.) Tuba County Water Agency, the real party in interest in this action, is a countywide public entity established by a special act of the Legislature in 1959 to develop and promote the use and regulation of the water resources of Tuba County.”
People v. West Side Cnty. Water Dist., 246 P.2d 119 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952). “(Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.) At the election the electors in the territory were privileged to vote on two propositions: (1) the formation of the district, and (2)- the directors to serve the district in the event its formation was authorized.”
Coachella Valley Water Dist. v. Super. Ct. (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “It argues the validation statutes apply to the SWP tax by operation of the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.), which makes the validation statutes applicable to any action to determine the validity of a county water district’s “assessment” (id.”
Orange Co. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics (Cal. Ct. App. 2017). “) Despite its name, the District is not a county water district under the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.) or a state water district under the California Water District Law (id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.