No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry Lotson SPENCE, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent-Appellee
v.
Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent-Appellee
01-6165.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 26, 2001.
Unpublished opinion
11 F. App'x 175
Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., pro se. Tara Louise Casey, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Niemeyer, Williams, Gregory.
Unpublished
[*176] PER CURIAM.
Henry Lotson Spence, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spence v. Brooks, No. CA-00-446 (E.D.Va. Dec. 28, 2000). We deny Spence’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.