No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph Lee JOYNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
v.
J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
01-6797.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 14, 2002.
Unpublished opinion
24 F. App'x 209
Joseph Lee Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Widener, Niemeyer, Luttig.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.CA. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Joyner v. Stouffer, No. CA-00-1119-AMD (D.Md. Apr. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.