No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael E. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and William T. Esrey, CCEO; Jim Kissinger, VP; Ronald E. Gier, VP; Nesa Rae Helm; Stephanie Blaine; Nancy Pelfresne; Cynthia Fisher; Lynn Smichk, Defendants
v.
SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and William T. Esrey, CCEO; Jim Kissinger, VP; Ronald E. Gier, VP; Nesa Rae Helm; Stephanie Blaine; Nancy Pelfresne; Cynthia Fisher; Lynn Smichk, Defendants
03-1967.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 10, 2004.
Unpublished opinion
86 F. App'x 660
Michael E. Harris, Appellant pro se. Charles Frederick Walters, Seyfarth Shaw, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Wilkinson, Michael, Gregory.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM.
Michael E. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Sprint United Management,[*661] Inc., in this action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Sprint United Management, Inc., No. CA-02-1239-A (E.D. Va. filed June 19, 2003 & entered June 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED