v.
Cleaver
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
DREW DOUGLAS CLEAVER,
aka Drew Cleaver,
Defendant-Appellant.
Malheur County Circuit Court
21CR27921; A181952
Erin K. Landis, Judge.
Submitted July 12, 2024.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Laura A. Frikert, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge. EGAN, J.
Affirmed.
664 State v. Cleaver
[*~663–665]EGAN, J.
Defendant appeals a supplemental judgment entered after a probation revocation hearing. Defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.[1]
Defendant pleaded guilty to unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on supervised probation for a period of 24 months. Over a year later, defendant was ordered to show cause why probation should not be revoked. After a hearing, the trial court continued probation, ordered 10 days in jail with credit for time served, and ordered defendant to complete eight days of work crew.
[*~664–665]Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the probation revocation hearing, and the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.