White v. King Cnty. Sheriff's Off., No. 2:23-cv-01761 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 6, 2024). · Go Syfert
White v. King Cnty. Sheriff's Off., No. 2:23-cv-01761 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 6, 2024). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
White
v.
King County Sheriff's Office
2:23-cv-01761.
District Court, W.D. Washington.
Sep 6, 2024.
Unknown

1 2 3

4 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE 7

MELISSA WHITE and ROGER WHITE, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-01761-JHC 8

Plaintiffs, ORDER 9 v. 10

KING COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al. , 11

Defendants. 12 13

14 This matter comes before the Court on King County Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) 15

Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. # 42. The briefing on the motion addresses the issue of a law 16

enforcement officer’s “implied license . . . to approach a resident to speak to the occupants.” 17 Dkt. # 42 at 5 (citing Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013)). The briefing does not address, 18 however, the Ninth Circuit’s discussion in United States v. Lundin, 817 F.3d 1151, 1158–60 19 (2016), nor does it discuss the application of RCW § 10.99.030 and RCW § 10.31.100. 20 In light of Lundin and the above statutes, the Court ORDERS supplemental briefing on 21 this issue. 22 Defendants’ brief must not exceed 2,100 words and must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on 23 September 13, 2024. 24 l Plaintiffs’ brief must not exceed 2,100 words and must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on 2 September 20, 2024. 3 The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to re-note Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 42) for 4 September 20, 2024. 5 Dated this 6th day of September, 2024. ° Cok 4. Chur 7 John H. Chun United States District Judge 8 9 10 1]