Ricky Hill v. State of Texas, No. 07-25-00116-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 28, 2025). · Go Syfert
Ricky Hill v. State of Texas, No. 07-25-00116-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 28, 2025). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ricky Hill
v.
the State of Texas
07-25-00116-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Apr 28, 2025.
Unpublished opinion
Published
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-25-00116-CR

RICKY HILL, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 364th District Court
Lubbock County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-2023-CR-0253, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding

April 28, 2025

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Ricky Hill, was convicted of assault[1] and sentenced, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, to six years of confinement. The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain case from which Appellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court. Notwithstanding the certification, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his conviction.

We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” By letter of April 3, 2025, we notified Appellant of the consequences of the trial court’s certification and directed him to show grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response or had any further communication with the Court to date.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Per Curiam Do not publish.