U.S v. Cisneros-Medina, 102 F.3d 549 (5th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
U.S v. Cisneros-Medina, 102 F.3d 549 (5th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“given the heightened due process protection afforded pretrial detainees, it is apparent that confinement conditions violative of the eighth amendment are assuredly violative of a pretrial detainee's due process rights as well.”
31 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Steven Jay Sencial v. Joseph Lopinto, III, et al. (laed, 2026-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Steven Jay Sencial v. Joseph Lopinto, III, et al.
E.D. La. · 2026 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we are quite certain that does not confer a constitutional right to exercise in unfiltered sunlight in an otherwise acceptable custodial facility regardless of the facility's physical constraints.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Mealy v. Gautreaux
M.D. La. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
given the heightened due process protection afforded pretrial detainees, it is apparent that confinement conditions violative of the eighth amendment are assuredly violative of a pretrial detainee's due process rights as well.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U.S
v.
Cisneros-Medina
95-20911.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 1, 1996.
102 F.3d 549
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: M.D. Louisiana (1)

102 F.3d 549

U.S.
v.
Cisneros-Medina[*]

NO. 95-20911

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct 28, 1996

Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CR-H-95-1

1

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2