Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. United States, 364 U.S. 280 (1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. United States, 364 U.S. 280 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States, 287 F. Supp. 374 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., INC.,
v.
UNITED STATES Et Al.
848.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1960.
Published opinion
364 U.S. 280
1960 U.S. LEXIS 1990
Mark P. Schlefer, John Cunningham and Israel Convisser for appellant., Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson, for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees; Jeremiah C. Waterman, Edward M. Reidy and Raymond A. Negus for other appellees.
Black, Pennsylvania.
Cited by 25 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, so far as it relates to the suspension of rates phase of the dispute, is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the cause as moot. United States v. Amarillo-Borger Express, 352 U. S. 1028; Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Dixie Carriers, 355 U. S. 179. With respect to the antitrust phase of the dispute, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent on the holding of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 324 U. S. 439.