Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
286 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 32 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Ex Rel. Cannon v. Johnson (paed, 1975-06-12) · Strongest negative: In Re Lopez (cal, 1965-01-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" In Re Lopez (3×)
Cal. · 1965 · signal: but see · confidence high
Is Proliferation Probable? (1963) 33 F.R.D. 423 , 424-425; but see Freund, New Vistas In Constitutional Law (1964) 112 U.Pa.L.Rev. 631, 637-638. [8] Smith v. Crouse (1964) 378 U.S. 584 [ 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 ] (per curiam); Ruark v. Colorado (1964) 378 U.S. 585 [ 84 S.Ct. 1935 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1042 ] (per curiam). [9] Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles (1958) 357 U.S. 214 [ 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 ]; but see Norvell v. Illinois (1963) 373 U.S. 420 [ 83 S.Ct. 1366 , 10 L.Ed.2d 456 ]. [10] Reck v. Pate (1961) 367 U.S. 433 [ 81 S.Ct. 1541 , 6 L.Ed.2d 948 ];…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States Ex Rel. Cannon v. Johnson
E.D. Pa. · 1975 · confidence medium
There is probable cause for appeal. *1374 SOME RECENT RETROACTIVITY DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS RETROACTIVITY DECISION CASE(S) APPLIED NOTE Doughty v. Maxwell, 376 U.S. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. fully retroactive 202, 84 S.Ct. 702 , 11 L.Ed.2d 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 650 (1964) 799 (1963) (right to counsel) Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. fully retroactive 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 353, 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d (1964) 811 (1963) (right to counsel on appeal) Linkletter v…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commonwealth v. DeSimone
Pa. · 1972 · confidence medium
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S. Ct. 1929 *384 (1964), holding that the right to counsel on appeal, guaranteed by Douglas v. California, 373 U.S. 353 , 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963), is fully retroactive, we must give our Anderson decision full retroactive effect.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Abu Khatallah
D.D.C. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. “[D]elay for the purpose of interrogation is the epitome of ‘unnecessary delay' ” and is inherently unreasonable.
examined Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Jones (3×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
Further, the Supreme Court has held both Douglas v. California, supra, and Griffin v. Illinois, supra, retroactive; see, Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964), and Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958) — a result indicating the Court’s view that the denial of the right to appeal creates the possibility of an unreliable verdict.
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Goins
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963), held retroactive by Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Robson (2×)
Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Senk, 412 Pa. 184, 193-94 , 194 A.2d 221 (1963), vacated on other grounds, 378 U.S. 562 , 84 S.Ct. 1928 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Edwin Gockley v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Senk v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 562 , 84 S.Ct. 1928 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964) and Oister v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 568 , 84 S.Ct. 1926 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1964).
cited Cited "see" United States v. America v. Richard Hamilton, Also Known as Richard Woods
7th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Muschette v. United States, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 239, 322 F.2d 989, 991 (1963), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 378 U.S. 569 , 84 S.Ct. 1927 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Earl Senk v. H. E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania
3rd Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See, [Com. v. Senk] 378 U.S. 562 , 84 S.Ct. 1928 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 * * * (1964).” The issue of the voluntariness of the appellant’s confession made in the early morning hours of January 21, 1962, more than 50 hours after his arrest at 9:15 P.M. on January 18, 1962, was submitted to the state trial court on the previously made trial record, supplemented by a brief stipulation.
examined Cited "see" United States ex rel. Edwards v. Follette (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964) (Douglas retroactive); Eskridge v. Washington, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958) (Griffin retroactive).
cited Cited "see" United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
E.D. Pa. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Senk v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 562 , 84 S.Ct. 1928 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964) which vacated and remanded Commonwealth v. Senk, 412 Pa. 184 , 194 A.2d 221 (1963) on authority of Jackson .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bobby Taylor, Alias Robert Harris
7th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Muschette v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 239 , 322 F.2d 989, 991 (1963), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 378 U.S. 569 , 84 S.Ct. 1927 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Jimmy Ray Bonds, Appellant-Petitioner v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Appellee-Respondent (6×)
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964); Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2 , 84 S.Ct. 80 , 11 L.Ed.2d 41 (1963).
examined Cited "see, e.g." John W. Bailey v. Allen Ault, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Center, Jackson, Georgia, No. 73-3229 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (3×)
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Smith v. Crouse, 1964, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 , reversing Smith v. Crouse, 1963, 192 Kan. 171 , 386 P.2d 295 , which had held that Douglas v. California, 1963, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 , was not to be accorded retrospective application; McConnell v. Rhay, 1968, 393 U.S. 2, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 32 , 21 L.Ed.2d 2 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Bailey v. Ault (3×)
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Smith v. Crouse, 1964, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 , reversing Smith v. Crouse, 1963, 192 Kan. 171 , 386 P.2d 295 , which had held that Douglas v. California, 1963, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 , was not to be accorded retrospective application; McConnell v. Rhay, 1968, 393 U.S. 2, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 32 , 21 L.Ed.2d 2 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Lee v. Henderson (3×)
W.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963), applied retroactively in Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 , 84 S.Ct. 1929 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SMITH
v.
CROUSE, WARDEN.
915 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
378 U.S. 584
Per Curiam.
Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.