Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (1964). · Go Syfert
Smith v. Crouse, 378 U.S. 584 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
243 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 29 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Cited for
Other citing cases9 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Crouse, Warden.
915 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
Published opinion
378 U.S. 584
1964 U.S. LEXIS 873
Per Curiam.
Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

Petitioner pro se.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.