green
Positive treatment
published
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Sheilah C. Hicks v. United States, 382 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1967).published
- Donnell v. Swenson, 258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Mo. 1966).published
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers, 213 A.2d 613 (Pa. 1965).published
- United States v. Daniel P. Flemino, 691 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir. 1982).published
- United States v. Thomas Murphy Donahue, 539 F.2d 1131 (8th Cir. 1976).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RUARK
v.
COLORADO.
v.
COLORADO.
1173 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
Published opinion
378 U.S. 585
1964 U.S. LEXIS 874
Per Curiam.
Cited by 35 opinions | Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
Petitioner pro se.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.