Ruark v. Colorado, 378 U.S. 585 (1964).
Search
Ruark v. Colorado, 378 U.S. 585 (1964). Book View Copy Cite
Ruark
v.
Colorado
1173 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
378 U.S. 585
Per Curiam.
Cited by 35 opinions  |  Published
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.