green
Positive treatment
published
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., 716 A.2d 950 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997).published
- E.M. Diagnostic Sys., Inc. v. Local 169, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 812 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1987).published
- Gen. Teamsters Local No. 231 v. Whatcom Cnty., 687 P.2d 1154 (Wash. Ct. App. 1984).published
- Indep. Oil Workers Union, Local 117 v. Am. Oil Co., 296 F. Supp. 650 (D. Kan. 1969).published
- Teledyne Wisconsin Motor v. Local 283, United Auto., Aerospace, & Agric. Implement Workers, 386 F. Supp. 1231 (E.D. Wis. 1975).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC.
v.
AMERICAN OIL CO.
v.
AMERICAN OIL CO.
55.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Published opinion
Per Curiam.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker and Michael H. Gottesman.
Frederic D. Anderson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard P. Tinkham and Daniel F. Kelly.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.