Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Florida Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs. v. Robinson, 112 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 2013)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 974 Determining court jurisdiction under constitutional review5 citing casesdismissing review because the district court had certified a question without ruling on the question certified1 citing court put it this way
  • Florida Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs. v. Robinson, 112 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 2013).published
    See Floridians For A Level Playing Field v. Floridians Against Expanded Gambling, 967 So.2d 832, 833 (Fla.2007); Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla.2001); Gee v. Seidman & Seidman, 653 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla.1995).
  • Powell v. State, 969 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).published
    Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla.2001); see also Gee v. Seidman & Seidman, 653 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla.1995) (dismissing the case because the district court did not address the issue contained in the certified qu…
  • Therrien v. State, 914 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 2005).published
    (dismissing review because the district court had certified a question without ruling on the question certified)
  • Coastal Florida Police Benev. Ass'n, Inc. v. Williams, 838 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 2003).published
    In Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla.2001), this Court dismissed review of a case because the district court had certified a question without ruling on the question certified.
  • Speedway Superamerica, LLC v. Dupont, 955 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 2007).published
    See Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 777 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla.2001); Gee v. Seidman & Seidman, *535 653 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla.1995).
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PIRELLI ARMSTRONG TIRE CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
Meta E. JENSEN, Respondent.
SC00-833.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 8, 2001.
Published opinion
777 So. 2d 973
2001 Fla. LEXIS 252
2001 WL 101710
Per Curiam.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

Wendy F. Lumish and Joseph H. Lang, Jr. of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Miami, FL, for Petitioner.

Hugh N. Smith and Diana L. Fuller of Smith & Fuller, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Respondents.

Sharon Lee Stedman, Orlando, FL, for the Florida Defense Lawyer's Association, Amicus Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

WHETHER THE APPLICATION OF A CONTINGENCY RISK MULTIPLIER TO AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER SECTION 768.79, FLORIDA STATUTES (1993), THE OFFER OF JUDGMENT STATUTE, VIOLATE[S] THE GUARANTEE OF[*974] EQUAL PROTECTION AFFORDED UNDER THE UNITED STATES OR FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 752 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Under article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution, this Court has jurisdiction to review "any decision of a district court of appeal that passes upon a question certified by it to be of great public importance." Because in rendering its decision, the Second District did not pass upon the question certified to this Court, we are without jurisdiction to review this case. See Gee v. Seidman & Seidman, 653 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, we dismiss review of this case as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.