Riegel Prods. Corp. v. Joseph W. Meyer, 465 U.S. 1091 (1984).

Riegel Prods. Corp. v. Joseph W. Meyer, 465 U.S. 1091 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published 1.5 score

204 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Automated Salvage Transp., Inc. v. NV KONINKLIJKE KNP BT, 106 F. Supp. 2d 606 (D.N.J. 1999)

Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1984 2005 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

Automated Salvage Transp., Inc. v. NV KONINKLIJKE KNP BT, 106 F. Supp. 2d 606 (D.N.J. 1999).published
Watson v. City of Salem, 934 F. Supp. 643 (D.N.J. 1995).published
Grabosky v. Tammac Corp., 127 F. Supp. 2d 610 (M.D. Pa. 2000).published

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 201

Cited "see" 2

Cited "see, e.g." 1

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Riegel Products Corporation, Inc.
v.
Joseph W. Meyer

83-1109.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Mar 14, 1984.

Published opinion

465 U.S. 1091

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, INC., et al.
v.
Joseph W. MEYER.

No. 83-1109.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1984.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed pursuant to Rule 53 of this Court.

Your account