green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.5 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
"This Court finds that the Plan's reimbursement language is unambiguous, and . . . overrides the make whole rule."
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bill Gray Enterprises, Incorporated Employee Health And Welfare Plan v. Ronald L. Gourley
this court finds that the plan's reimbursement language is unambiguous, and . . . overrides the make whole rule.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Walker v. Rose
because .... the make whole rule is just,a principle of interpretation, it can be overridden by clear language in the plan.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oklahoma Natural Gas v. LaRue
the presumptive validity of the certificate may be rebutted and defeated on summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Administrative Committee for the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health & Welfare Plan v. Salazar
See Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers, 64 F.3d 1389 , 1395 (9th Cir.1995) citing Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293, 1297 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 255 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biomet, Inc. Health Benefit Plan v. Black
See Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 820 F.Supp. 1146, 1150-51 (W.D.Wis.1991), aff'd, 993 F.2d 1293 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 255 (1993); Murzyn v. Amoco Corp., 925 F.Supp. 594 (N.D.Ind.1995); Carpenter v. Modern Drop Forge Co., . 919 F.Supp. 1198 (N.D.Ind.1995); Fravel v. Stankus, 936 F.Supp. 474 (N.D.Ill.1996); Estate of Lake v. Marten, 946 F.Supp. 605 (N.D.Ill.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
ABC, INC. v. PrimeTime 24, Joint Venture
See Bourne Co. v. Hunter Country Club, Inc., 990 F.2d 934, 937 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 256 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Pampered Chef, Ltd. v. Magic Kitchen, Inc.
See Bourne Company v. Hunter Country Club, Inc., 990 F.2d 934, 937 (7th Cir.1993), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 256 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bollman Hat Company v. Kevin T. Root Dale E. Anstine, P.C. Bollman Hat Company, as Sponsor of the Bollman Hat Company Health and Welfare Benefits Plan
(2×)
See Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (7th Cir.) (declining to adopt federal common law rule preventing full reimbursement where the clear language of an ERISA plan requires full reimbursement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 255 (1993); Blackburn v. Becker, 933 F.Supp. 724, 729 (N.D.Ill.1996) (employee may not withhold attorney's fees because "there is no reason to fiddle with an unambiguous plan provision which the parties freely entered into."); Trident Reg'l Health Sys. v. Polin, 948 F.Supp. 509, 514 (D.S.C.1996) ("[F]ederal courts do not rewri…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bollman Hat Co v. Root
See Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (7th Cir.) (declining to adopt federal common law rule preventing full reimbursement where the clear language of an ERISA plan requires full reimbursement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 (1993); Blackburn v. Becker, 933 F. Supp. 724, 729 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ives v. Coopertools
See Judge Posner's discussion contrasting the economic merits of applying the make whole interpretive principle versus utilizing a subrogation clause in Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293, 1297-99 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 (1993) ("It is true that rejecting 'make whole' would bring subrogation closer to assignment, but that would not necessarily be a bad thing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald J. Dade v. Sherwin-Williams Company
See e.g., Bourne Co. v. Hunter Country Club, Inc., 990 F.2d 934, 938 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 256 (1993); Schulz v. Serfilco, Ltd., 965 F.2d 516 , 519 *1140 (7th Cir.1992); Maksym v. Loesch, 937 F.2d 1237, 1240-41 (7th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie Huff v. Uarco, Incorporated, William M. Schoolman v. Uarco, Incorporated, and the Trustees of the Uarco Retirement Plan
See e.g., Bourne Co. v. Hunter Country Club, Inc., 990 F.2d 934, 938 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 256 (1993) (where defendant denied the materiality of plaintiffs statement of facts, defendant failed to deny material facts, and they were properly deemed admitted); Schulz v. Serfilco, Ltd., 965 F.2d 516, 519 (7th Cir.1992) (upholding district court’s decision to deem admitted defendant’s Rule 12 facts to which plaintiff failed to specifically respond, even where plaintiff generally disputed those facts throughout its briefs); Maksym v. Loesch, 937…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. Group Benefits Plan for Salaried and Non-Bargaining Hourly Employees v. Leonard Whitehurst, Jr.
Id.; see also Cutting v. Jerome Foods, Inc., 993 F.2d 1293, 1295-96 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 308 , 126 L.Ed.2d 255 (1993). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. Alden Owners, Inc.
See, e.g., Autoskill Inc., 994 F.2d 1476 at 1483-6 (10th Cir.1993) ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 916 , 114 S.Ct. 307 , 126 L.Ed.2d 254 (1993) (denying a motion to dismiss appeal and holding that section 108(b) extended debtor’s time to file notice of appeal and that filing notice of appeal would not violate the automatic stay of section 362(a)); In re Green, 180 B.R. 514 (holding that the time for filing a notice of appeal, as extended by 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b), had expired, and that res judicata applied as a result of the failure to timely appeal a judgment of foreclosure).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cutting
v.
Jerome Foods, Inc
v.
Jerome Foods, Inc
93-268.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1993.
Published
Cutting et al.
v.
Jerome Foods, Inc.
No. 93-268.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 12, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 7th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 993 F. 2d 1293.