Freeman v. Dir. TDCJ-ID, No. 96-40647 (5th Cir. Feb. 19, 1997). · Go Syfert
Freeman v. Dir. TDCJ-ID, No. 96-40647 (5th Cir. Feb. 19, 1997). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Freeman
v.
Director TDCJ-ID
96-40647.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 19, 1997.
Unpublished opinion
Unpublished
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40647
USDC No. 6:94-CV-1046

DENNIS RAY FREEMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus

DIRECTOR TDCJ-ID,

Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas

---------------------
February 6, 1997
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dennis Ray Freeman, Texas prisoner # 411531, appeals the district court’s judgment denying habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Freeman argues that he was deprived of a neutral and detached hearing officer at his parole revocation hearing in violation of the Due Process Clause. We have reviewed the issues raised by Freeman and conclude that the minimum requirements of procedural due process were met and that there is

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 96-40647 some evidence in the record to support the parole revocation decision. See Villarreal v. United States Parole Comm’n, 985 F.2d 835, 839 (5th Cir. 1993); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 485 (1972). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.