green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. State
See Fults v. State, 274 Ga. 82 , 548 S.E.2d 315 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 , 122 S.Ct. 1210 , 152 L.Ed.2d 148 (2002) (court applied Strickland after noting that attorney was deceased); King v. State, 808 So.2d 1237 (Fla.2002) (court applied test in Strickland although attornéy was deceased and could not testify); Hauck v. Mills, 941 F.Supp. 683 (M.D.Tenn.1996) (court applied Strickland to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel .even though attorney was deceased).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Adams
See United States v. Lopez, 271 F.3d 472, 484 (3d Cir. 2001), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 908 (2002); People v. Cuevas, 12 Cal. 4th 252, 271-272 (1995); People v. Johnson, 701 P.2d 620, 622 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985); State v. Ildefonso, 72 Haw. 573, 580-581 (1992); State v. Woodbury, 127 Idaho 757, 760 (Ct. App. 1995); Treadway v. State, 924 N.E.2d 621, 628-629 (Ind. 2010); State v. Stokes, 829 So. 2d 1009, 1010 (La. 2002); People v. Sykes, 229 Mich. App. 254, 266-269 (1998); Smith v. State, 25 So. 3d 264, 272-274 (Miss. 2009); State v. Stoppleworth, 667 N.W.2d 586, 588-589 (N.D. 2003); State v. Whittl…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimenez
See United States v. Lopez, 271 F.3d 472, 489 (3d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 , 122 S.Ct. 1211 , 152 L.Ed.2d 148 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimenez
See United States v. Lopez, 271 F.3d 472, 489 (3d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. State
See Fults v. State, 274 Ga. 82 , 548 S.E.2d 315 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 , 122 S.Ct. 1210 , 152 L.Ed.2d 148 (2002) (court applied Strickland after noting that attorney was deceased); King v. State, 808 So.2d 1237 (Fla.2002) (court applied test in Strickland although attorney was deceased and could not testify); Hauck v. Mills, 941 F.Supp. 683 (M.D.Tenn.1996) (court applied Strickland to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel even though attorney was deceased).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Cong Duc Le
See United States v. Lopez, 271 F.3d 472, 484-485 (3d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 , and cert, denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoffner
See United States v. Mathis, 264 F.3d 321, 335 (3d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 908 , 122 S.Ct. 1211 , 152 L.Ed.2d 148 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Dudek
Although “an ALJ may not disregard [a claimant's] subjective pain allegations solely because they are not fully supported by objective medical evidence, an ALJ is entitled to make a factual determination that a[c]laimant's subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary.” Ramirez v. Barnhart, 292 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir.2002) (internal citation omitted); see also Goodale v. Halter, 257 F.3d 771, 774 (8th Cir.2001) (noting that an ALJ may discount subjective complaints if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole), cert. denied, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McDonald v. Dudek
Although “an ALJ may not disregard [a claimant's] subjective pain allegations solely because they are not fully supported by objective medical evidence, an ALJ is entitled to make a factual determination that a[c]laimant's subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary.” Ramirez v. Barnhart, 292 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir.2002) (internal citation omitted); see also Goodale v. Halter, 257 F.3d 771, 774 (8th Cir.2001) (noting that an ALJ may discount subjective complaints if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole), cert. denied, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spatola v. O'Malley
Although “an ALJ may not disregard [a claimant's] subjective pain allegations solely because they are not fully supported by objective medical evidence, an ALJ is entitled to make a factual determination that a[c]laimant's subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary.” Ramirez v. Barnhart, 292 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir.2002) (internal citation omitted); see also Goodale v. Halter, 257 F.3d 771, 774 (8th Cir.2001) (noting that an ALJ may discount subjective complaints if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole), cert. denied, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruben Gonzales v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Although “an ALJ may not disregard [a claimant’s] subjective pain allegations solely because they are not fully supported by objective medical evidence, an ALJ is entitled to make a factual determination that a[c]laimant’s subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary.” Ramirez v. Barnhart, 292 F.3d 576, 581 (8th Cir.2002) (internal citation omitted); see also Goodale v. Halter, 257 F.3d 771, 774 (8th Cir.2001) (noting that an ALJ may discount subjective complaints if there are inconsistencies in the evidence as a whole), cert. denie…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goodale
v.
Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
v.
Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security
01-7996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 2002.
Published
GOODALE
v.
BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY.
No. 01-7996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 4, 2002.
1
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 257 F. 3d 771.