green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 602 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002); see also Preliminary “Penalty Phase” Jury Instruction No. 5 (“You must not take anything I said or did during the ‘merits phase’ of the trial or anything I may say or do during this ‘penalty phase’ as indicating what I think of the evidence or what I think the sentence on any of the Counts in question should be.”); Final “Penalty Phase” Jury Instruction No. 9 (“Let me remind you again that nothing that I have said in these instructions — and …
cited
Cited "see"
Harold Ray v. United States
See United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 599 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co.
(2×)
See Skamania County v. Woodall, 104 Wash.App. 525 , 536 n. 11, 16 P.3d 701 , review denied, 144 Wash.2d 1021 , 34 P.3d 1232 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 399 (2002); RAP 10.4(h).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold D. Ray
See United States v. Ray (Ray I), 250 F.3d 596, 603 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002). 1 On remand the district court sentenced Ray to 60 months on each of the drug counts, to be served concurrently with his 97 month sentence for witness tampering.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Ray
See United States v. Ray (Ray I), 250 F.3d 596, 603 (8th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 1459 (2002).1 On remand the district court sentenced Ray to 60 months on each of the drug counts, to be served concurrently with his 97 month sentence for witness tampering.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Ashton Oslund
See also United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 602 (8th Cir.2001) (gaps in tape recording were not so substantial as to render entire recording untrustworthy and defendant could argue to jury that he was entrapped by informant into making incriminating statements), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002); cf. Webster, 84 F.3d at 1065 (finding court did not abuse its discretion in admitting videotape where lens was partially obscured and did not cover all of the actions of those being recorded and the audio was partially unclear because the “infirmities are not so p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ABX Air, Inc.
v.
Airline Professionals Association of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 1224, AFL-CIO
v.
Airline Professionals Association of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 1224, AFL-CIO
01-914.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 2002.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of Air Transport Association of America, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.