State v. Andrade-Torres, 817 P.2d 296 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). · Go Syfert
State v. Andrade-Torres, 817 P.2d 296 (Or. Ct. App. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Florencio ANDRADE-TORRES, Appellant.
C900254CR CA A65847.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Oct 2, 1991.
Published opinion
817 P.2d 296
1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1453
Richardson, P.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

David E. Groom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was indicted for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance as "part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network." He demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was overruled. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was convicted of both charges.

The court erred by overruling the demurrer. State v. Moeller, 105 Or. App. 434, 806 P.2d 130, rev. allowed 311 Or. 349, 811 P.2d 144, rev. dismissed 312 Or. 76, 815 P.2d 701 (1991). Because the demurrer should have been granted, the other claims of error are moot.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss indictment.