DG Mach. & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 166 S.E.2d 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
DG Mach. & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 166 S.E.2d 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Dowling v. State, 172 S.E.2d 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969)
How cited ↗
Cited for
119 Ga. App. at 195 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Dowling v. State, 172 S.E.2d 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).published 2 cites
    Co. v. Hardy, 119 Ga. App. 194 ( 166 SE2d 580 ) and Calloway v. State, 119 Ga. App. 194, 195 ( 166 SE2d 613 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D. G. Machinery & Gage Company
v.
Hardy Et Al.
43458.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Feb 26, 1969.
Published opinion
166 S.E.2d 580
1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1038
Fine &■ Block, A. J. Block, Jr., for appellant., Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Robert E. Corry, Jr., for appellees.
Bell, Hall, Quillian.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Hall, Judge.

In D. G. Machinery & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 118 Ga. App. 45 (162 SE2d 852), this court denied appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal, relying upon the 1968 amendment (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1074) to the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, and decided the case upon the merits. The Supreme Court reversed (Hardy v. D. G. Machinery & Gage Co., 224 Ga. 818 (165 SE2d 127)), citing Fahrig v. Garrett, 224 Ga. 817 (165 SE2d 126).

The judgment of this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

Appeal dismissed.

Bell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur. Hall, J., also concurs specially.

Concurrence

Hall, Judge,

concurring specially.

Ours is not to reason why—

Ours is to dismiss the appeal Upon a technicality and sigh—

“Fiat Justitia Ruat Coelum.”