State Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs. v. Est. of Budney, 541 N.W.2d 245 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). · Go Syfert
State Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs. v. Est. of Budney, 541 N.W.2d 245 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Cited for
541 N.W.2d at 246 Authorizing state recovery from surviving spouse's estate7 citing cases[Section 1396p(b)] does not counter the initial blanket prohibition by specifically authorizing a State to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a recipient from a surviving spouse's estate[.]1 citing court put it this way · 5 listed here
  • In re the Est. of Bruce, 260 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).published 6 cites
    ([Section 1396p(b)] does not counter the initial blanket prohibition by specifically authorizing a State to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a recipient from a surviving spouse's estate[.])
  • In re the Est. of Barg, 752 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. 2008).published
    Aid, 221 Ill.2d 222 , 302 Ill.Dec. 711 , 850 N.E.2d 148, 152-53 (2006); In re Estate of Budney, 197 Wis.2d 948 , 541 N.W.2d 245, 246 (1995), rev. denied 546 N.W.2d 471 (Wis.1996).
  • In re The Est. of James Clifford Smith, No. M2005-01410-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2006).published
    Hines v. Dept. of Public Aid, 850 N.E.2d 148, 153 (Ill. 2006); In re Estate of Budney, 541 N.W.2d 245, 246 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
  • Hines v. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 831 N.E.2d 641 (Ill. App. Ct. 3d Dist. 2005).published 3 cites
    This was the rationale applied by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in In re Estate of Budney , 197 Wis. 2d 948, 951 , 541 N.W.2d 245, 246 (Wis. App. 1995), which concluded that its state statute authorizing recovery of medical assistance pay…
  • Hines v. Dep't of Pub. Aid, 850 N.E.2d 148 (Ill. 2006).published 3 cites
    See In re Estate of Budney, 197 Wis. 2d 948, 950 , 541 N.W.2d 245, 246 (App. 1995); In re Estate of Craig, 82 N.Y.2d 388, 394 , 624 N.E.2d 1003, 1006 , 604 N.Y.S.2d 908, 911 (1993).
197 Wis. 2d at 951 “section 1396p(b) does not counter the initial blanket prohibition by specifically authorizing a state to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a recipient from a surviving spouse's estate.”1 citing case1 citing court quotes it
  • In re the Est. of Bruce, 260 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).published 6 cites
    “[Section 1396p(b) ] does not counter the initial blanket prohibition by specifically authorizing a State to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a recipient from a surviving spouse’s estate[.]”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Estate of Paul Budney, Deceased: State of Wisconsin, Department of Health and Social Services, Appellant,
v.
Estate of Paul Budney, Respondent
95-0982-FT.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Oct 31, 1995.
Published opinion
541 N.W.2d 245
1995 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1349
For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs oí James E. Doyle, attorney general by Donald P. Johns, assistant attorney general., For the respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs oí Angela E. Canellos of Wauwatosa.
Wedemeyer, Sullivan, Fine.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: Missouri Court of Appeals (2)
WEDEMEYER, P.J.

The Department of Health and Social Services appeals from the trial court's judgment. [1] The trial court ruled that the department could not recover from Paul Budney's estate medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of Grace Budney, his predeceased wife, because federal law does not authorize the recovery of benefits. The issue is whether § 49.496(3)(a), STATS., which allows the department to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a person from the estate of that person's surviving spouse, violates federal law. We conclude that it does. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the estate.

Grace Budney was a resident of a nursing home and a recipient of medical assistance. She died after residing in the home for over a year. A year after her death, her husband Paul Budney died. After Paul Budney's death, the department filed a claim against his estate for $54,042 pursuant to § 49.496(3)(a), STATS., seeking to recover medical assistance benefits[*950] paid on behalf of Grace Budney. The estate objected to the claim on the ground that federal law prohibits the recovery of medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a predeceased spouse. The trial court concluded that the Wisconsin statute violated 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(b) (1995) and granted summary judgment in favor of the estate. The department appeals.

The State of Wisconsin has enacted legislation which allows the Department of Health and Social Services to file a claim against the estate of a recipient or against the estate of the surviving spouse of a recipient for the amount of medical assistance paid on behalf of the recipient while the recipient resided in a nursing home. Section 49.496(3)(a), STATS. [2] Federal law mam dates that state plans for medical assistance comply with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1396p with respect to recovering medical assistance correctly paid. See 42 U.S.C. § 1396(a)(18). 42 U.S.C. § 1396p(b) provides:

(1) No adjustment or recovery of any medical assistance correctly paid on behalf of an individual under the State plan may be made, except that the State shall seek adjustment or recovery of any medical assistance correctly paid on behalf of an individual under the State plan in the case of the following individuals:
[*951] (B) In the case of an individual who was 55 years of age or older when the individual received such medical assistance, the State shall seek adjustment or recovery from the individual's estate ....
(2) Any adjustment or recovery under paragraph (1) may be made only after the death of the individual's surviving spouse, if any ....

In the first section, the statute plainly prohibits a State from recovering medical assistance benefits except in certain situations. The statute provides that "[no] adjustment or recovery of any medical assistance correctly paid on behalf of an individual under the State plan may be made . . . except in the case of the following individuals ...." After this initial prohibition, the statute does not specifically authorize a State to recover medical assistance benefits from a recipient's surviving spouse's estate. Because the statute does not counter the initial blanket prohibition by specifically authorizing a State to recover medical assistance benefits paid on behalf of a recipient from a surviving spouse's estate, we conclude that § 49.496(3)(a), Stats., which allows such recovery, exceeds the authority provided by the federal statute. Accord Estate of Craig, 624 N.E.2d 1003 (N.Y. 1993) (Federal law does not expressly provide for recovery of Medicaid payments on behalf of a predeceased spouse from the secondarily dying spouse's estate). The trial court properly rejected the department's claim to recover from Paul Budney's estate medical assistance paid on behalf of Grace Budney.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

1

This is an expedited appeal under Rule 809.17, Stats.

2

Section 49.496(3), Stats., provides:

Recovery from Estates, (a) Except as provided in par. (b), the department shall file a claim against the estate of a recipient or against the estate of the surviving spouse of a recipient for all of the following unless already recovered by the department under this section:
1. The amount of medical assistance paid on behalf of the recipient while the recipient resided in a nursing home or while the recipient was an inpatient in a medical institution and was required to contribute to the cost of care.