green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nunez v. United States
But because “we have no power to vacate a judgment that has not been shown to be (or been conceded to be) in error,” Price v. United States, 537 U. S. 1152, 1153 (2003), I continue to resist GVR disposition when the Government, without conceding that a judgment is in error, merely suggests that the lower court’s basis for the judgment is wrong, see Lawrence, supra, at 183 , and n. 3; cf. Alvarado v. United States, 497 U. S. 543, 545 (1990) (Rehnquist, C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castro-Coello
“If the Government does not file [ ] notice [ ] the lower sentencing range will be applied even though the defendant may otherwise be eligible for the increased penalty.” Id.; accord Price v. United States, 537 U.S. 1152, 1152 , 123 S.Ct. 986 , 154 L.Ed.2d 888 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perdue v. Baker
Sess. 2 (codified at OCGA § 28-2-2 (Supp.2002)). [2] See 42 U.S.C.A. § 1973c (West 1994). [3] See Georgia v. Ashcroft, 195 F.Supp.2d 25, 29 (D.D.C.2002) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1973c), vacated, 539 U.S. ___ , 123 S.Ct. 2498 , 156 L.Ed.2d 428 (2003). [4] See id. at 31 (denying preclearance to State Senate redistricting plan, but granting a declaratory judgment that the U.S. Congressional and State House redistricting plans satisfied federal voting rights requirements). [5] See Georgia v. Ashcroft, 204 F.Supp.2d 4 (D.D.C.2002). [6] See id. at 16 . [7] See Act No. 444 of April 11, 2002, 2002 Ga. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
v.
Louisiana Public Service Commission Et Al.
v.
Louisiana Public Service Commission Et Al.
02-299.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, March 3, 2003. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, April 2, 2003. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 21, 2003. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply