Hill v. Cockrell, 232 S.E.2d 384 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Hill v. Cockrell, 232 S.E.2d 384 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Levy v. Aiken, 298 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
  • Levy v. Aiken, 298 S.E.2d 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).published 2 cites
Hill
v.
Cockrell
53309.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jan 14, 1977.
Published opinion
232 S.E.2d 384
1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1749
Wendell C. Lindsey, for appellant., Dock H. Davis, for appellee.
Webb, Deen, Marshall.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
Webb, Judge.

"[W]here the trial judge, sitting as the trior of the facts, hears the evidence, his findings based upon conflicting evidence is analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it.” West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398 (185 SE2d 763) (1971);Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 (199 SE2d 917) (1973). Here there was ample legal evidence to support the findings of fact, and there is no error in the trial judge’s conclusions of law. [1]

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.
1

For prior appearance see Hill v. Cockrell, 139 Ga. App. 616 (229 SE2d 105) (1976).