Battles v. Battles, 227 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Battles v. Battles, 227 S.E.2d 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Battles
v.
Battles Et Al.
51796.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Jun 8, 1976.
Published opinion
227 S.E.2d 524
1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2338
Page, Scrantom, Harris, McGlamry & Chapman, Joan Swift, for appellant., H. Palmer Carr, Jr., Assistant U. S. Attorney, Schumacher, Collins & Oates, Samuel W. Oates, Jr., Thomas O. L. Collins, for appellees.
Bell, Clark, Stolz.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Bell, Chief Judge.

This is a post-judgment garnishment case which was commenced prior to July 1, 1975, pursuant to our then existing garnishment statutes. The Supreme Court in Coursin v. Harper, 236 Ga. 729, held that the Georgia procedure for pre-judgment and post-judgment garnishment as it existed prior to July 1, 1975, failed to provide due process and was unconstitutional. Coursin [*842] controls and the judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff must be reversed.

Argued February 2, 1976 Decided June 8, 1976. Page, Scrantom, Harris, McGlamry & Chapman, Joan Swift, for appellant. H. Palmer Carr, Jr., Assistant U. S. Attorney, Schumacher, Collins & Oates, Samuel W. Oates, Jr., Thomas O. L. Collins, for appellees.

Judgment reversed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.