McCollum v. Pope, 411 S.E.2d 874 (Ga. 1992). · Go Syfert
McCollum v. Pope, 411 S.E.2d 874 (Ga. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Cited for
actual receipt of OCGA § 44-14-162.2 notice of initiation of proceedings to exercise the power of sale in a mortgage, security deed, or other lien contract is immaterialno pin page on record · 3 citing cases listed
  • River Farm, LLC v. Hall Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, No. A26A0330 (Ga. Ct. App. June 30, 2026).published 2 cites
    (actual receipt of OCGA § 44-14-162.2 notice of initiation of proceedings to exercise the power of sale in a mortgage, security deed, or other lien contract is immaterial)
  • Zeller v. Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 471 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).published 2 cites
    (actual receipt of OCGA § 44-14-162.2 notice of initiation of proceeding to exercise the power of sale in a mortgage, security deed or other lien contract immaterial)
  • Five Star Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Colonial Credit Union, 431 S.E.2d 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993).published 2 cites
    (actual receipt of OCGA § 44-14-162.2 notice of initiation of proceedings to exercise the power of sale in a mortgage, security deed, or other lien contract is immaterial)
411 S.E.2d at 874 cited at this page1 citing case
  • John Quarles v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 18-11285 (11th Cir. Feb. 7, 2019).unpublished
    But the Supreme Court of Georgia has held that “the actual receipt (or want of receipt) by the grantor of the notice of sale under power is 3 Case: 18-11285 Date Filed: 02/07/2019 Page: 4 of 5 immaterial to the right of the grantee to sale…
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
McCOLLUM
v.
POPE Et Al.; FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF GEORGIA, N.A. v. POPE Et Al.
S91A1632, S91A1633.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 17, 1992.
Published opinion
411 S.E.2d 874
1992 Ga. LEXIS 22
Schwall & Ruff, Emory A. Schwall, Frederick B. Whittington III, Donald L. Mize, for appellants., Jerome C. Ware, for appellees.
Weltner, Clarke, Bell, Hunt, Fletcher, Benham.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Weltner, Presiding Justice.

Upon the default by the grantor of a security deed, the grantee initiated a sale under power contained in the deed. It is undisputed that the grantee mailed a notification of the sale under power correctly addressed to the grantor in accordance with OCGA § 44-14-162.2. [1] Under these circumstances, the actual receipt (or want of re[*836] ceipt) by the grantor of the notice of sale under power is immaterial to the right of the grantee to sale under power.

Decided January 17, 1992 — Reconsideration denied February 5, 1992. Schwall & Ruff, Emory A. Schwall, Frederick B. Whittington III, Donald L. Mize, for appellants. Jerome C. Ware, for appellees.

The judgment of the trial court to the contrary must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Clarke, C. J., Bell, Hunt, Fletcher, JJ., and Judge John W. Sognier concur. Benham, J., disqualified.
1

(a) Notice of the initiation of proceedings to exercise a power of sale in a mortgage, security deed, or other lien contract shall be given to the debtor by the secured creditor no later than 15 days before the date of the proposed foreclosure. Such notice shall be in writing and shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return[*836] receipt requested, to the property address or to such other address as the debtor may designate by written notice to the secured creditor. The notice required by this Code section shall be deemed given on the official postmark day.

(b) The notice required by subsection (a) of this Code section shall be given by mailing to the debtor a copy of the published legal advertisement or a copy of the notice of sale submitted to the publisher. [Emphasis supplied.]

Before the enactment of OCGA § 44-14-162.2 in 1981, foreclosure required only notice by publication. OCGA § 44-14-162. See Nat. Community Builders v. C & S Nat. Bank, 232 Ga. 594 (207 SE2d 510) (1974) (foreclosure pursuant to realty foreclosure statutes does not violate procedural due process rights).