Lewis v. State, 283 S.E.2d 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981). · Go Syfert
Lewis v. State, 283 S.E.2d 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rogers v. State (gactapp, 1987-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rogers v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moss v. State, 159 Ga. App. 317, 319 ( 283 SE2d 275 ) (1981). 4.
cited Cited "see" Adkins v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moss v. State, 159 Ga. App. 317, 319 ( 283 SE2d 275 ); Jefferson v. State, 157 Ga. App. 324, 326 (2) ( 277 SE2d 317 ); Tift v. State, 132 Ga. App. 10 (2) ( 207 SE2d 261 ). 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis
v.
the State
61737.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 22, 1981.
283 S.E.2d 275
1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2586
Ralph M. Walke, Richard T. Taylor, for appellant., Beverly B. Hayes, Jr., District Attorney, H. Jeff Lanier, Jack T. Wimbish, Jr., Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.
Shulman, Birdsong, Sognier.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Shulman, Presiding Judge.

Along with his co-defendant Michael Falsetta, appellant was tried for and convicted of the offense of possession of marijuana. Although they pursued separate appeals, appellant and Falsetta raised several issues in common: the denial of a motion to suppress, denial of a motion for new trial based on the failure of a juror to respond truthfully to a question during voir dire, and the refusal of the trial court to reveal exculpatory evidence or seal the prosecution’s file for appellate review. All three of those issues were decided by another panel of this court in Falsetta v. State 158 Ga. App. 392 (280 SE2d 411) (1981).

In Falsetta, this court ruled that the motion to suppress was properly denied and referred the trial court to Barnes v. State, 157 Ga. App. 582 (277 SE2d 916) (1981) for resolution of the issue of sealing the prosecution’s file. On the issue of the failure of a juror to respond truthfully during voir dire, this court found reversible error. We are bound by that holding since the events were the same as those in this case. We therefore reverse appellant’s conviction and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur. [*302] Rehearing denied July 1,1981, and July 16,1981 Ralph M. Walke, Richard T. Taylor, for appellant. Beverly B. Hayes, Jr., District Attorney, H. Jeff Lanier, Jack T. Wimbish, Jr., Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.