neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.2 score
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“The language of the statute does not make Congress’ intention to allow such taxation ‘unmistakably clear.’”
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Hammond, 384 F.3d 674 (9th Cir. 2004).published“The language of the statute does not make Congress’ intention to allow such taxation ‘unmistakably clear.’”
- Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Nez Perce Tribe Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Duwayne D. Hammond, Jr. Coleen Grant Larry Watson Severina Sam Haws, in Their Off. Capacity as Commissioners of the Idaho State Tax Comm'n, Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho Nez Perce Tribe, & Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Duwayne D. Hammond, Jr. Coleen Grant Larry Watson Severina Sam Haws, in Their Off. Capacity as Commissioners of the Idaho State Tax Comm'n, Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, & Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Nez Perce Tribe v. Duwayne D. Hammond, Jr. Coleen Grant Larry Watson Severina Sam Haws, in Their Off. Capacity as Commissioners of the Idaho State Tax Comm'n, 384 F.3d 674 (9th Cir. 2004).published“The language of the statute does not make Congress' intention to allow such taxation `unmistakably clear.'”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patterson
v.
Michigan Department of Corrections
v.
Michigan Department of Corrections
03-9651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 2004.
Published opinion
541 U.S. 1068
2004 U.S. LEXIS 3768
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
PATTERSON
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
No. 03-9651.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 24, 2004.
1
Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.