green
Positive treatment
Trending · 163 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 4×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases, last quoted 2011 ·
…the bare fact , unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gavino Duron v. State
the bare fact , unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gavino Duron v. State
the bare fact , unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gavino Duron v. State
the bare fact , unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reginal Wayne Young v. State
the bare fact , unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.
cited
Cited "see"
Kimball Douglas Hailey II v. State
See 119 S.W.3d 262 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hernandez v. Thaler
See Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (“The wishes of the victim’s family members as to the defendant’s fate fall beyond the parameters of victim-impact evidence and are not admissible.”), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004). “[W]e strongly discourage the State from soliciting or making any reference to the wishes of the victim’s family or friends about the punishment to which the defendant should be sentenced.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 (quoting Ladd v. State, 3 S.W.3d 547, 567 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1070 , 120 S.Ct. 1680 , 146 L.Ed.2d 487 (2000)); see Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Crutsinger v. State
See Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 790 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard B. Reed v. State
Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004). 15 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ratliff v. State
Id. at 77 ; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. State
Compare Rubio v. State, 241 S.W.3d 1, 9-11 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) Crawford error), Clay, 240 S.W.3d at 904-05 (Crawford error), Scott v. State, 227 S.W.3d 670, 690-95 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) (Crawford error), Davis v. State, 203 *362 S.W.3d 845, 850-53 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) (Crawford error), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 , 127 S.Ct. 2037 , 167 L.Ed.2d 774 (2007), Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 777-82 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (erroneous admission of confession), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004), and McCarthy v. State, 65 S.W.3d at 52-56 (erroneous admission of confession), …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dancer v. State
Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 ; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert, denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004). 20 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Capps v. State
Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77 ; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cer t. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re J.B.C.
Id.; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re JBC
Id.; see also Simpson v. State, 119 S.W.3d 262, 272 (Tex.Crim.App.2003), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2837 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stables v. United States
Gaubert, 499 U.S. at 326 , 111 S.Ct. 1267 ; see e.g., Thames Shipyard and Repair Company v. United States, 350 F.3d 247, 255 (1st Cir.2003)(the discretionary function exception was not at issue and there was no exercise of policy judgment in Indian Towing), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2849 , 159 L.Ed.2d 269 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carroll
v.
Potter, Postmaster General
v.
Potter, Postmaster General
03-1489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (4)
CARROLL
v.
POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, ET AL.
No. 03-1489.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 14, 2004.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 75 Fed. Appx. 874.