green
Positive treatment
published
Trending · 124 recent citers
Issue: prompt instructionTX ↗
Issue: law of invited errorTX ↗
Issue: Crawford errorTX ↗
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“The bare fact [that appellant had been to the penitentiary], unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.”
- Reginal Wayne Young v. State, No. 07-05-00249-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Sept. 28, 2006).unpublished“The bare fact [that appellant had been to the penitentiary], unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.”
- Gavino Duron v. State, No. 07-10-00115-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 23, 2011).unpublished“The bare fact [that appellant had been to the penitentiary], unembellished, was not so inflammatory as to undermine the efficacy of the trial court's instruction to disregard it.”
Other citing cases
- Kimball Douglas Hailey II v. State, 413 S.W.3d 457 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2012).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carroll
v.
Potter, Postmaster General
v.
Potter, Postmaster General
03-1489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2004.
Published opinion
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (4)
CARROLL
v.
POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, ET AL.
No. 03-1489.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 14, 2004.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 75 Fed. Appx. 874.