“if planning boards had no alternative but to rubber-stamp their approval on every subdivision plat which conformed with the zoning ordinance, there would be little or no reason for their existence”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pizzo Mantin Group v. Township of Randolph
if planning boards had no alternative but to rubber-stamp their approval on every subdivision plat which conformed with the zoning ordinance, there would be little or no reason for their existence
cited
Cited "see"
NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
See Cooper v. Gov’t Employees, 51 N.J. at 94, fn. 3 , 237 A.2d 870 , citing Mariani v. Bender, 85 N.J.Super. 490, 500 , 205 A.2d 323 (App.Div. 1964), cert. denied, 44 N.J. 409 , 209 A.2d 143 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
POPULAR REFRESHMENTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
FULLER'S MILK BAR AND RECREATION CENTER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
v.
FULLER'S MILK BAR AND RECREATION CENTER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
Messrs. Gelman & Gelman and Mr. Newton M. Roemer for the petitioner.
Mr. Victor P. Mullica for the respondent.
Denied.