12 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pearl Assur. Co., Ltd. v. Wattsgreen2 sentences2000"Cooperation and assistance of the insured [pursuant to the cooperation clause of the policy] requires a fair, frank, and truthful disclosure of information reasonably demanded by the insurer...." Pearl Assurance Co. v. Watts, 58 N.J.Super. 483, 491 , 156 A .2d 725 (App.Div. 1959). 2000"Cooperation and assistance of the insured [pursuant to the cooperation clause of the policy] requires a fair, frank, and truthful disclosure of information reasonably demanded by the insurer...." Pearl Assurance Co. v. Watts, 58 N.J.Super. 483, 491 , 156 A .2d 725 (App.Div. 1959). | 2 | 4 |
Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New Jerseygreen1 sentence2022See Longobardi, 121 N.J. at 533 (holding "when an insurance policy clearly states that material misrepresentations will void the policy, the insurer need not pay the insured for an alleged loss if the insured makes a material misrepresentation to the insurer while it is investigating the claim"). | 1 | 1 |
Pearl Assur. Co., Ltd. v. Wattsgreen1 sentence1971Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Watts, supra, at 490; accord, Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Watts, 69 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Prudential Prop. & Cas. v. Nardone
green
2 sentences2004Co. of New Jersey v. Nardone, 332 N.J.Super. 126 , 752 A. 2d 859 (Law Div.2000) (dismissing AAA complaints and PIP claims with prejudice after chiropractor and providers failed to provide discovery, thereby breaching the cooperation clause of the automobile insurance policy); Prudential Prop. & Cas. 2004Co. of New Jersey v. Nardone, 332 N.J.Super. 126 , 752 A. 2d 859 (Law Div.2000) (dismissing AAA complaints and PIP claims with prejudice after chiropractor and providers failed to provide discovery, thereby breaching the cooperation clause of the automobile insurance policy); Prudential Prop. & Cas. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Deblon v. Beaton
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 352 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Selective Ins. v. Hudson East Pain
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 425-29, 5 A.3d 166 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Shaw v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
green
1 sentence2010Id. at 331 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Mariani v. Bender
green
2 sentences1998Id. at 498 , 205 A.2d 323 . 1998Id. at 498 , 205 A.2d 323 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Popular Refreshments, Inc. v. FULLER'S MILK BAR AND RECREATION CENTER
green
1 sentence1971Super. 490, 500 ( App. Div. 1964), certif. den. 44 N.J. 409 (1965), Hanover has failed to demonstrate that Conville, the assured, deliberately breached the cooperation clause in a material and essential particular. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Katz v. Nassau Electric R. Co.
green
1 sentence1962"The purpose of the cooperation clause is to constrain the assured to cooperate in good faith with the insurance company in the defense of claims." American Surety Co. v. Diamond, 1 N.Y. 2 d 594, 599, 154 N.Y.S. 2 d 918, 136 N.E. 2 d 876, 879 ( Ct. App. 1956). | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.