Bernhardt v. Howe-bernhardt, 224 S.W.3d 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Bernhardt v. Howe-bernhardt, 224 S.W.3d 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Taryn Piers v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections (moctapp, 2024-04-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Taryn Piers v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections
Mo. Ct. App. · 2024 · confidence medium
LPP Mortg., Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 53-54 (Mo. App. W.D. 2007).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kacie Nickel v. Stephens College
Mo. Ct. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
In addition to this Court finding no duty, which was Nickel’s claim of error regarding her prima facie tort claim, such a claim requires, inter alia, a showing of defendant’s “intent to injure the plaintiff.” LPP Mortg., Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 53-54 (Mo.App.W.D. 2007).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Wallace v. St. Francis Medical Center
Mo. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 54 (Mo.App.2007).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Baker v. Department of Mental Health
Mo. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
E.D.2010) (“[Cjourts are considered experts on the question of attorney’s fees, and the judge who tries a case and is acquainted with the issues can fix the amount of attorney’s fees without the aid of evidence.”); LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) President Casinos, Inc. v. Columbia Sussex Corp. (In Re President Casinos, Inc.)
E.D. Mo. · 2009 · confidence medium
Porter, 611 S.W.2d at 273 (rejecting defendant’s argument that a valid justification for defendant’s actions was his statutory right to stop payment on the check because “[i]t is not the exercise of the lawful right to stop payment which creates the tort” but an “act [ ] done with intent to injure and without justification”); LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 55 (Mo.Ct.App.2007)(“Because every claim of prima facie tort is predicated on the intentional commission of a lawful act, a mere legal right to perform that act is not enough to defeat the claim.”) While w…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Taylor-McDonald v. Taylor
Mo. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Marcin, Inc., 224 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Mo.App.2007) (“In awarding attorney fees, trial courts ‘should consider the time spent, nature and character of services rendered, nature and importance of the subject matter, degree of responsibility imposed on the attorney, value of property or money involved, degree of professional ability required and the result.’ ”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel Joseph BERNHARDT, Respondent,
v.
Mary Elizabeth HOWE-BERNHARDT, Appellant
WD 65670.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Mar 6, 2007.
224 S.W.3d 50
2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 355
2007 WL 654238
Dennis J. Campbell Owens, Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Jillana D. Michel-Setzer, Brady C. Kopek, Co-Counsel, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Newton, Breckenridge, Ellis.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Howe-Bernhardt appeals from the judgment dissolving her marriage to Daniel Bernhardt. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law appears, and that the court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).