Munro v. Elk Rapids Schs., 189 N.W.2d 224 (Mich. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
Munro v. Elk Rapids Schs., 189 N.W.2d 224 (Mich. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dryden v. Marcellus Community Schools Board of Education (michctapp, 1976-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dryden v. Marcellus Community Schools Board of Education
Mich. Ct. App. · 1976 · confidence medium
Munro v Elk Rapids Schools, 385 Mich 618 ; 189 NW2d 224 *45 (1971), adopting the minority opinion of Justice T.G.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Blurton v. Bloomfield Hills Board of Education
Mich. Ct. App. · 1975 · confidence medium
The Supreme Court, upon rehearing in Munro v Elk Rapids Schools, 385 Mich 618 ; 189 NW2d 224 *746 (1971), in adopting the minority opinion of Justice, now Chief Justice, T.
discussed Cited "see" Lakeshore Board of Education v. Grindstaff
Mich. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rehberg I, supra, Rehberg II, supra, Long, supra, Munro v Elk Rapids Schools (On Rehearing), 385 Mich 618 ; 189 NW2d 224 (1971), Weckerly v Mona Shores Bd of Ed, 388 Mich 731 ; 202 NW2d 777 (1972), Shiffer v Gibraltar School Dist Bd of Ed, 393 Mich 190 ; 224 NW2d 255 (1974), Ajluni v West Bloomfield School Dist Bd of Ed, 397 Mich 462 ; 245 NW2d 49 (1976), Dryden v Marcellus Community Schools Bd of Ed, 401 Mich 76 ; 257 NW2d 79 (1977), Lipka v Brown City Community Schools (On Rehearing), 403 Mich 554 ; 271 NW2d 771 (1978), Breuhan v Plymouth-Canton Community Schools, 425 Mich 278 ; 389 NW2d…
discussed Cited "see" Ferndale Education Ass'n v. School District for City of Ferndale 1
Mich. Ct. App. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Munro v Elk Rapids Schools, 385 Mich 618 ; 189 NW2d 224 (.1971), Wilson v Flint Board of Education, 361 Mich 691 ; 106 NW2d 136 (1960), Weckerly v Mona Shores Board of Education, 388 Mich 731 ; 202 NW2d 777 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Munro
v.
Elk Rapids Schools
24 January Term 1970, Docket No. 52,508. No. 18 June Term 1971, Docket No. 52,508.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Aug 27, 1971.
189 N.W.2d 224
Foster, Lindemer, Swift & Collins (by James A. White and Lynwood E. Beekman), for plaintiff., Zerafa & Zerafa (by Robert J. Kievit), for defendants., Amici Curiae: American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan (by Erwin B. Ellmann)., American Civil Liberties Union (by Melvin L. Wulf, Legal Director).
Black, Kavanagh, Adams, Brennan, Swainson, Williams.
Cited by 36 opinions  |  Published

Rehearing

On Rehearing

Per Curiam.

We granted rehearing in this case to reconsider the question which divided our Court[1] and to weigh the effect of Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), 397 US 254 (90 S Ct 1011, 25 L Ed 287) decided subsequent to our prior decision herein on the question of due process.

We are satisfied that the Michigan statute[2] properly interpreted fully satisfies the constitutional requirements of due process.

For the reasons set forth in the minority opinion heretofore filed herein and reported at 383 Mich 661, beginning at 688, which is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court, we hold that under the statute, unless a probationary teacher is notified in writing that his work is unsatisfactory, upon completion of his probationary period he is entitled to employ[*620] ment with tenure status with all of its specified rights and privileges.

Let mandamus issue as prayed.

T. M. Kavanagh, C. J., and Adams, T. E. Brennan, T. G. Kavanagh, Swainson, and Williams, JJ., concurred.
1

(1970), 383 Mich 661.

2

MCLA § 38.71 et seq. (Stat Ann 1968 Rev § 15.1971 et seq.).

Dissent

Black, J.

(dissenting). I adhere to the majority opinion and decision (383 Mich 661). Nothing set forth in Goldberg v. Kelly (1970), 397 US 254 (90 S Ct 1011, 25 L Ed 2d 287), upon alleged strength of which the instant rehearing was ordered, is offended by our said decision. Indeed, Goldberg is not presently assigned as applicable to or for reversal of that decision.

My vote on rehearing is cast for affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals (17 Mich App (368).