Tibbetts v. State, 583 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Tibbetts v. State, 583 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 810 “Specifically, we reject appellant's contention that he could not be found guilty of an attempt to purchase cocaine when the substance used by the police in the reverse sting operation involving appellant was fake cocaine.”1 citing casethe opinion's own words at *810
  • Brooks v. State, 762 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 2000).published
    See, e.g., Tibbetts v. State, 583 So.2d 809, 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Louissaint v. State, 576 So.2d 316, 317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Darold TIBBETTS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
90-1159.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 14, 1991.
Published opinion
583 So. 2d 809
1991 WL 152500
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

[*810] Victoria Vilchez-Williams, Royal Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We have considered all of the points raised by appellant and find no reversible error. Specifically, we reject appellant's contention that he could not be found guilty of an attempt to purchase cocaine when the substance used by the police in the reverse sting operation involving appellant was fake cocaine. Cf. State v. Cohen, 409 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.