State v. Mayer, 760 So. 2d 309 (La. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Mayer, 760 So. 2d 309 (La. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Clements, 112 So. 3d 306 (La. Ct. App. 2013)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 310 “reflected that the trial judge vacated the defendant's original sentence and thereby eliminated any possible confusion as to the terms of the defendant's confinement.”4 citing cases3 citing courts quote it
  • State v. Allen, 79 So. 3d 1220 (La. Ct. App. 2011).published
    See State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/31/00) , 760 So.2d 309 (citing State ex rel.
  • State v. Taylor, 975 So. 2d 10 (La. Ct. App. 2007).published
    See, La.C.Cr.P. art. 921; Compare, State v. Mayer, 99-3124 (La.3/31/00), 760 So.2d 309, 310 (per curiam) (To the extent that the commitment/minute entry reflects that the trial judge vacated the defendant's original sentence and thereby el…
  • State v. Collins, 44 So. 3d 775 (La. Ct. App. 2010).published
  • State v. Cummings, 79 So. 3d 386 (La. Ct. App. 2011).published
Other citing cases4 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Sterling MAYER, Jr.
1999-K-3124.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Mar 31, 2000.
Published opinion
760 So. 2d 309
2000 WL 354198
Per Curiam.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published

[*310] PER CURIAM.[*]

Granted in part; denied in part. The order of the court of appeal vacating the defendant's multiple offender sentence and remanding for resentencing is vacated, and the defendant's multiple offender sentence as imposed by the trial court is reinstated. To the extent that the October 30, 1998 commitment/minute entry reflects that the trial judge vacated the defendant's original sentence and thereby eliminated any possible confusion as to the terms of the defendant's confinement, the failure of the transcript of the multiple offender hearing to show that the court did so before sentencing the defendant as a multiple offender did not affect the substantial rights of the defendant. La.C.Cr.P. art. 921; see State ex rel. Haisch v. State, 575 So.2d 816 (La.1991) ("The trial court is ordered to vacate the twenty-one year sentence it first imposed coincidentally with its imposition of the enhanced sentence. See La. R.S. 15:529.1(D)."). In all other respects the application is denied.

[*] Lemmon, J., not on panel. See La. S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.