Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2002–2018 · …from a 'final judgment of conviction,' though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face. at p. 735 ✓
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2008 · …motion for nunc pro tunc order to correct invalid affirmative finding of a deadly weapon. at p. 735 ⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …no statute vests this court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. at p. 735 ✓
132 citation events (132 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ronald Wayne Schofield v. State (texapp, 2014-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ronald Wayne Schofield v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if the trial court denies the motion for judgment nunc pro tunc or fails to respond, relief may be sought by filing an application for writ of mandamus in a court of appeals.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John Phillip Bender v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see Abbott, 271 S.W.3d at 697 ; see also Gomez v. State, No. 03-20-00460-CR, 2020 WL 6018570 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 6, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal of denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc); McIntosh v. State, 110 S.W.3d 51, 52 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, order) (explaining that defendant has right to appeal from rulings other than final judgment of conviction “only when ‘expressly granted by law’” (quoting Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 409 (Tex. …
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sosimo Ballalba Gonzalez v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Benjamin Alan Morrison v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. · 2022 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism'd).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Remigio A. Martinez III v. State
Tex. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
“No statute vests [an appellate court] with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.” Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.); accord Reyes v. State, No. 04-12-00267-CR, 2012 WL 2602965 , at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 5, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Wilson v. State, No. 02-12-00382-CR, 2013 WL 257278 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 24, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Desilets v. State
Tex. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
See State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316 , 321 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (“A defendant’s general right to appeal under Article 44.02, V.A.C.C.P., and its predeces sors has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment,’ though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face.”); Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 311-12 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (dismissing appeal from denial of judgment nunc pro tunc for lack of jurisdiction); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref'd) (dismissing appeal regarding the trial court’s denial of ju…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Watson, Van Jr.
Tex. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
See Lozano v. State, No. 01-13-00180-CR, 2013 WL 2106570 , at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] May 14, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Zelaya v. State, Nos. 0 1"' 11-00977 -CR, 0 1-11-00978-CR, 01-11- 00979-CR, 2013 WL 127439 , at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 10, 2013, I no pet.) (mem .. op., not designated for publication); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism'd).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ronald Whit Dubose v. State
Tex. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
“No statute vests this [c]ourt with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.” Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.); accord Mederos v. State, No. 04-08-00621-CR, 2008 WL 4809211 , at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 5, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ronald Whit Dubose v. State
Tex. App. · 2015 · confidence medium
“No statute vests this [c]ourt with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.” Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.); accord Mederos v. State, No. 04-08-00621-CR, 2008 WL 4809211 , at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Nov. 5, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Martin Aleman v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
App. 1997); Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Allen v. State, 20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet.); see also Suarez v. State, No. 03-14-00477-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10635 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 25, 2014, no pet. h.) (dismissing appeal in similar case). 2
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Michael A. Smith v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
App. 2004) (providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file petition for writ of mandamus in court of appeals); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (mem. op.). 3 See Tex. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Arturo Medina v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
App. 1990) (“A defendant’s general right to appeal . . . has always been limited to appeal from a ‘final judgment,’ though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face.”); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (“No statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc.”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Van Watson, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
See Lozano v. State, No. 01-13-00180-CR, 2013 WL 2106570 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 14, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Zelaya v. State, Nos. 01-11-00977-CR, 01-11-00978-CR, 01-11- 00979-CR, 2013 WL 127439 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 10, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gerardo Leyva v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
App.1997); see also Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311 , 312 2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (stating that the court lacked jurisdiction to review an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref'd) (same); Allen v. State, 20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet.) (holding that an order denying nunc pro tunc relief is not appealable, the court of appeals has no jurisdiction over such an appeal, and the correct way to attack such an order is by mandamus).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Armando Lozano v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
See Zelaya v. State, Nos. 01-11-00977-CR, 01-11-00978-CR, 01-11-00979- CR, 2013 WL 127439 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 10, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Paul Ray Desilets v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Fire Insurance Exchange v. Judy Kennedy
Tex. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
App. 2004) (providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file petition for writ of mandamus in court of appeals); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). 3 See Tex. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Frederick D. Pimpton v. State
Tex. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
App. 2004) (providing that appropriate remedy for denial of motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file petition for writ of mandamus in court of appeals); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). [3] See Tex. R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robbie Loftin v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); Vernon v. State, No. 10-09-00292-CR, 2009 WL 3645710 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 4, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robbie Loftin v. State
Tex. App. · 2011 · confidence medium
Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d ); Vernon v. State , No. 10-09-00292-CR, 2009 WL 3645710 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 4, 2009, no pet.) ( mem . op ., not designated for publication).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alonzo Dee Freeman v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · confidence medium
See Kelly v. State, 151 S.W.3d 683, 686-87 (Tex. App.—Waco 2004, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. ref’d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Kenneth Jackson v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet dism’d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Garland Scroggins v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, pet dism'd).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Charles Lee Grable v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App. B Waco 2002, pet dism = d); Bridwell v. State , 2007 WL 3391469 at *1 (Tex. App-Beaumont Nov. 14, 2007, no pet).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Abbott v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Crawford v. State, 226 S.W.3d 688, 691 (Tex.App.-Waco 2007, no pet.) (Gray, C.J., dissenting) (“This Court has appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case only when expressly provided by law.” Appendix A: withdrawn majority opinion)); Kelly v. State, 151 S.W.3d 683, 685 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet.); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (right to appeal “is derived entirely from statute”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Elizabeth Anne Rohr v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
App. P. 43.2(f); Sanchez , 112 S.W.3d at 312; Everett , 82 S.W.3d at 735.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Crawford v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
Kelly v. State, 151 S.W.3d 683, 685 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet.); Ex parte McGregor, 145 S.W.3d 824, 825 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2004, no pet.); Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 311 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (per curiam); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (right to appeal “is derived entirely from statute”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Larry Martin Roche v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
Sanchez v. State , 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Moffatt v. State , No. 2-05-372-CR, 2005 WL 3082253 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Nov. 17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) in Re: Aaron J. Burk
Tex. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See id. at 148-49 ; see also In re Mendoza , 131 S.W.3d 167, 167-68 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding) (mandamus may issue where trial court unnecessarily delays in ruling); Sanchez v. State , 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (appellate court has no jurisdiction over a direct appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc to correct jail time credit); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (same).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Christopher T. Butts v. State
Tex. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); Moffatt v. State , No. 2-05-372-CR, 2005 WL 3082253 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth November 17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) in Re: Albert Gary Taylor
Tex. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
See id. at 148-49 ; see also In re Mendoza , 131 S.W.3d 167, 167-68 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding) (mandamus may issue where trial court unnecessarily delays in ruling); Sanchez v. State , 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (appellate court has no jurisdiction over a direct appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc to correct jail time credit); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (same).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kelly v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
LEXIS 8797, at *2 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, no pet. h.); Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 311 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (per curiam); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Rushing v. State, 85 S.W.3d 283, 285 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (right to appeal “is derived entirely from statute”).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alfredo Galindo, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
See Rakas , 439 U.S. at 140 , 99 S. Ct. at 428 -29 ; Pierce , 959 F.2d at 1303 ; Head v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 738 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, pet. ref’d).
cited Cited as authority (rule) in Re: Steven Don Evans
Tex. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Sanchez v. State , 112 S.W.3d 311 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi, no pet. h.); Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.App.--Waco 2002, pet. dism'd).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McIntosh v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
Texas courts have consistently construed article 44.02 to allow an appeal only "from a `final judgment [of conviction],' though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face." Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism'd) (quoting Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 408-09 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, no pet.) (quoting State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316 , 321 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.
cited Cited "see" Victor Moreno v. the State of Texas
Tex. App. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (“No statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc 1 TEX.
cited Cited "see" Wade Byron Morgan v. State
Tex. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. 1 State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); Allen v. State, 20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet. [mand. denied]).
cited Cited "see" Robert Jason Logan v. State
Tex. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). 1 We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
cited Cited "see" Robert C. Morris v. State
Tex. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735 , 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see also Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim.
cited Cited "see" Willie D. Beasley v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.–Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
cited Cited "see" Willie Ray v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.–Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
discussed Cited "see" Jorge Alberto Zelaya AKA Jaime A. Carranza v. State
Tex. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); see e.g., Pope v. State, 05-10-01455-CR, 2011 WL 924477 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Dallas, Mar. 18, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Loftin v. State, 02-10- 00531-CR, 2011 WL 476858 , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, Feb. 10, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
cited Cited "see" Kevin Smith v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. ref'd) (Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc .).
cited Cited "see" Richard Bernard Stepp v. State
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
discussed Cited "see" Michael Richard Ewing v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
discussed Cited "see" Fernando Mederos v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); see also Vineyard v. State, No. 04-07-00575-CR, 2007 WL 2935836 at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Oct. 10, 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication).
cited Cited "see" Jon Drew Rich v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d).
cited Cited "see" Denarius Dartiz Guillory v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. ref'd) (Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc .).
cited Cited "see" David Bridwell, Jr. v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.--Waco 2002, pet. dism'd)(Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc .).
cited Cited "see" Timothy W. Moffatt A/K/A Timothy Moffatt v. State
Tex. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d) (mem. op.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ryan EVERETT, Appellant,
v.
the STATE of Texas, Appellee
10-02-169-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas.
Oct 2, 2002.
82 S.W.3d 735
Ryan Everett, Bonham, pro se., John W. Segrest, McLennan County Dist. Atty., Waco, for appellee.
Davis, Vance, Gray.
Cited by 91 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 83%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TOM GRAY, Justice.

Ryan Everett pleaded guilty to sexual assault. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment, suspended imposition of sentence, and placed him on community supervision for five years. The court revoked Everett’s community supervision and imposed the original sentence in June 2000. Everett filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in May 2002 complaining that he had not received proper credit for the jail time he served before imposition of sentence. The court denied this motion and Everett appealed.

Article V, section 6 of the Texas Constitution invests this Court with jurisdiction over “all cases of which the District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law.” Tex. Const. art. V, § 6. Article 44.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides in pertinent part, “A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal.” Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (Vernon 1979). Texas courts have consistently construed article 44.02 to allow an appeal only “from a ‘final judgment [of conviction],’ though the statute does not contain this limitation on its face.” Benford v. State, 994 S.W.2d 404, 408-09 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, no pet.) (quoting State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1990)).

This Court has jurisdiction over other types of criminal appeals only when “expressly granted by law.” Benford, 994 S.W.2d at 409 (quoting Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1991)). No statute vests this Court with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc. See State v. Ross, 953 S.W.2d 748, 751-52 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.