Lambert v. State, 635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Lambert v. State, 635 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Matthews v. State, 736 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 93 Reversing overly broad probation conditions1 citing casecondition which provided the defendant "have no contact with children under age 10" was too broad1 citing court put it this way
  • Matthews v. State, 736 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).published
    (condition which provided the defendant "have no contact with children under age 10" was too broad)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bonnie LAMBERT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
92-2855.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 2, 1994.
Published opinion
635 So. 2d 93
1994 WL 60828
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Jane D. Fishman, Plantation, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's convictions, but reverse two conditions of probation. We reverse the condition that appellant use no alcohol because this condition is not reasonably related to the offenses or defendant's rehabilitation. See Baker v. State, 609 So.2d 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Daniels v. State,[*94] 583 So.2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We reverse the condition that defendant have no contact with children under age 10 because this condition is too broad. It must be more specific so that the defendant cannot be charged with an unintentional violation of it. See Dean v. State, 629 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

WARNER, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.