Huff v. J & M House Builders, Inc., 298 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Huff v. J & M House Builders, Inc., 298 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: S.J.H. v. J.P.H., 699 S.W.3d 588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 552 Instruct jury on comparative fault and statutory duty5 citing casescomparative fault instruction included claim that plaintiffs decedent negligently failed to stop at crossing as required by statute1 citing court put it this way
At page 550 Prejudicial error from reading statute to jury3 citing casesholding that reading and displaying a statute to the jury is prejudicial error1 citing court put it this way
At page 553 cited at this page1 citing case
  • S.J.H. v. J.P.H., 699 S.W.3d 588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2024).published
    Co., 298 S.W.3d 546, 553 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009) (quoting Eltiste v. Ford Motor Co., 167 S.W.3d 742, 754 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005)).
Carl and Sheila HUFF, Appellants,
v.
J & M HOUSE BUILDERS, INC., Respondent
ED 93065.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Oct 27, 2009.
Published opinion
298 S.W.3d 546
2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1535
2009 WL 3444863
Zane T. Cagle, St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Russell F. Watters, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Crane, Ahrens, Odenwald.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carl and Sheila Huff (Plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of J & M House Builders, Inc. (Respondent).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).