Hooker v. Super Prods. Corp., 751 So. 2d 880 (La. 1999). · Go Syfert
Hooker v. Super Prods. Corp., 751 So. 2d 880 (La. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 904 Determining ordinary user's reasonable actions1 citing case
  • LaSalle v. Wilson Trailer Co., 787 So. 2d 1173 (La. Ct. App. 2001).published
    Under this set of facts, the fifth circuit recognized that “[t]here was nothing in the evidence to suggest that an ordinary user, such as plaintiff, would not, under similar circumstances, climb onto the truck to guide the hose onto the re…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perry Allen HOOKER
v.
SUPER PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Donald R. Schweitzer d/b/a Shamrock Pipe Tools, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, as successor corporation, as successor corporation to E. Meyers Company, a division of McNeil Laboratories, The Polymer Corporation and Maylor Supply Company, Inc.,
99-C-2911.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Dec 17, 1999.
Published opinion
751 So. 2d 880
1999 WL 1286197
1999 La. LEXIS 3529
Victory.
Published

Denied.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.