Jackson v. Powell, 546 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Jackson v. Powell, 546 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Khutorsky v. Ilina, 75 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1146 Trial court limitations on modifying child support without pleading5 citing casesThe trial court may not circumvent such required pleadings by ordering a child support modification on its own motion....1 citing court put it this way · 4 listed here
  • Khutorsky v. Ilina, 75 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).published
    (The trial court may not circumvent such required pleadings by ordering a child support modification on its own motion....)
  • Williams v. Williams, 690 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).published
    State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Colonel, 627 So.2d 1320, 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), cause dismissed, 642 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1994); Jackson v. Powell, 546 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
  • State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Burns, 654 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).published 2 cites
    Jackson v. Powell, 546 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Pla. 3d DCA 1989).
  • Wooding v. Williams, 581 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).published
    See Jackson v. Powell, 546 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So.2d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wanda JACKSON and Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants,
v.
Reginald Jerome POWELL, Appellee.
88-2093.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 25, 1989.
Published opinion
546 So. 2d 1145
1989 WL 81681
Nesbitt, Baskin and Cope.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

Melvin A. Rubin, for appellants.

Reginald Jerome Powell, in pro. per.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order modifying a child support obligation because there was no pleading or motion filed requesting such modification which would have afforded the appellant adequate and proper notice of[*1146] the requested relief. E.g., Pace v. Pace, 471 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Sweetland v. Gauntlett, 460 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Valdes v. Valdes, 460 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The trial court may not circumvent such required pleadings by ordering a child support modification on its own motion, see Koken v. Neubauer, 374 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), unless proper notice is given so that the opposing party has a fair opportunity to oppose the motion.

Reversed.