State, Dept. of Ins. v. FDIC, 610 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
State, Dept. of Ins. v. FDIC, 610 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gray v. Gray, 658 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 695 610 So.2d 695 (1992) STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, as Receiver of National United Insurance Company, Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE…1 citing caseopening of page *695 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • Gray v. Gray, 658 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).published
    One distinction we noted was that the Gregoires had two minor children "for whom the wife has primary residential custody, whereas no children were involved in the Kremer marriage." 615 *610 So.2d at 695.
At page 696 Salomon, Kanner, Damian & Rodriguez and Juan E. Rodriguez, Miami, for appellant. Ann S. Duross, Richard J. Osterman, Jr., Michael H. Krimminger, Washington,…1 citing caseopening of page *696 (no citing court says what it cites this page for)
  • Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fleet Credit Corp., 616 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).published
    We held accordingly, in Department of Ins. v. FDIC, 610 So.2d 695, 696 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), that claims against a failed bank, after the FDIC has been appointed receiver, "must be commenced or continued in the United States District Court f…
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, as Receiver of National United Insurance Company, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, As Receiver of First American Bank & Trust National Association, Appellee.
92-785.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 22, 1992.
Published opinion
610 So. 2d 695
1992 WL 379859
Nesbitt, Jorgenson and Levy.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

[*696] Salomon, Kanner, Damian & Rodriguez and Juan E. Rodriguez, Miami, for appellant.

Ann S. Duross, Richard J. Osterman, Jr., Michael H. Krimminger, Washington, DC, Matt E. Beal, Orlando, S. Alyssa Roberts, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Ltd., and Patricia H. Thompson, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order granting the motion by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver for First American Bank & Trust, North Palm Beach, Florida and dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the claims against it brought by National United Insurance Company (National). The trial court correctly concluded that under the instant facts it had no subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (1989 & Supp. 1992), over National's claim against FDIC, raised after the receiver was already in existence. Such claims, following exhaustion of the claims requirements, must be commenced or continued in the United States District Court for the district within which the depository institution's principal place of business is located or in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(6)(A) (1989 & Supp. 1992).

Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.