Puls v. City of Port St. Lucie, 678 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Puls v. City of Port St. Lucie, 678 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether, under the facts of this case, there was an unlawful refusal of access to the records within the meaning of section 119.12(1), florida statutes (1995).”
13 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., etc. (fladistctapp, 2021-12-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether, under the facts of this case, there was an unlawful refusal of access to the records within the meaning of section 119.12(1), florida statutes (1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cookston v. Office of the Public Defender
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Lucie, 678 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Production of the records after the lawsuit was filed did not moot the issues .raised in the complaint.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Schweickert v. Citrus County Florida Board
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Lucie, 678 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Production of the records after the lawsuit was filed did not moot the issues raised in the complaint.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Consumer Rights, LLC v. Bradford County
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
Lucie, 678 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Wisner v. City of Tampa Police Dep’t, 601 So.2d 296, 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William PULS and Janna Puls, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, Donald Cooper, Roger Orr, and Mark Hendricks, Appellees.
95-3166.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 28, 1996.
678 So. 2d 514
Per Curiam.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 81%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)

Jeffrey S. Kurtz, Wellington, for appellants.

Rhea P. Grossman of Rhea P. Grossman, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

As to the City of Port St. Lucie and city manager Donald Cooper, we reverse the order granting the motion to dismiss. Appellants were the proper party plaintiffs to the lawsuit seeking public records. The complaint facially stated a cause of action for relief under chapter 119, Florida Statutes (1995). Whether or not the custodian designated under section 119.021 was served with a records request is not germane to this lawsuit. Section 119.07(1)(a) imposes a duty of disclosure upon "[e]very person who has custody of a public record." (Emphasis supplied). Under the statute, the custodian, or custodian's designee, supervises the manner of disclosure. § 119.07(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Production of the records after the lawsuit was filed did not moot the issues raised in the complaint. We remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether, under the facts of this case, there was an unlawful refusal of access to the records within the meaning of section 119.12(1), Florida Statutes (1995). We affirm the dismissal as to appellees Orr and Hendricks.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.