Seeber v. State, 956 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Seeber v. State, 956 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas SEEBER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
4D07-1624.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 23, 2007.
Published opinion
956 So. 2d 1240
2007 WL 1486120
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled "Motion to Modify Sentence." The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).

GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.