Coates v. Walters, 368 U.S. 34 (1961).

Coates v. Walters, 368 U.S. 34 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published 1.1 score

45 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: In re Lindner, 71 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1979)

Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1961 1993 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

In re Lindner, 71 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't 1979).published
Katz v. Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 67 Misc. 2d 308 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971).published

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 42

Cited "see, e.g." 2

Compared "cf." 1

Treatment by court

Frequently cited alongside

#2	green	Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950)	co-cited 3×
#3	green	Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979)	co-cited 3×
#4	green	Sporza v. . German Sav. Bank, 84 N.E. 406 (N.Y. 1908)	co-cited 3×

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

COATES
v.
WALTERS.

339, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov 6, 1961.

Published opinion

368 U.S. 34

1961 U.S. LEXIS 202

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Per Curiam.

Cited by 13 opinions | Published

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Vito J. Cassan for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Your account